This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Investor Funds of Company Cannot Be Taxed as Director’s Personal Unexplained Money u/s 69A
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Jagmohan Singh Bedi Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2015-16
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Jagmohan Singh Bedi Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
The Assessing Officer made an addition of ₹59.18 crore under section 69A in the hands of the assessee, alleging that amounts received from hundreds of investors in the name of a real estate group company (M/s IFAMA Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd.) represented unexplained money of the assessee. The same addition was made protectively for AYs 2015-16 and 2016-17 and substantively for AY 2017-18, effectively taxing the same alleged amount across multiple years.
The assessee contended that he was merely a low-paid employee of the group...






