Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Shann Jewellers (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Shann Jewellers (ITAT Delhi) Loan Repayments Explained from Stock Sales and Fresh Borrowings; Demonetisation Cash Sales Accepted as Genuine The Assessing Officer made two major additions for AY 2017-18: (i) ₹2.15 crore treating repayment of unsecured loans as unexplained under section 68, and (ii) ₹1.74 crore treating part of demonetisation-period cash sales as unexplained cash deposits taxable under section 68 read with section 115BBE. On the first issue, the CIT(A) analysed comparative balance sheets and cash flows and found that the firm had generated funds by reducing its closin...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031