Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pankaj Jindal Contractor Vs DCIT (ITAT Amritsar)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Pankaj Jindal Contractor Vs DCIT (ITAT Amritsar) Reopening After Four Years Quashed as Change of Opinion — Disallowance Under Section 40A(3) and Addition Under Section 68 Set Aside The Amritsar Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal in full and quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated under Sections 147/148 for A.Y. 2014-15, holding them to be invalid as a mere change of opinion. The assessee, a civil contractor, had originally been assessed under Section 143(3) after detailed scrutiny of cash expenses (machinery rent, carriage of material) and unsecured loans, with the AO m...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Salary Taxable Only on Accrual, Not Mere Form 16 or 26AS Entries: Bengaluru ITAT Search Assessments Restored Despite Non-Compliance, Subject to ₹50,000 Cost: Bengaluru ITAT Section 270A Penalty Invalid Without Specific Charge: Bengaluru ITAT TDS Credit Denied Where Income Taxed in Another Entity’s Hands: ITAT Bangalore Foreign Tax Credit Can’t Be Denied for Technical Lapses if Form 67 Was Timely Filed: Bengaluru ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031