Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pankaj Jindal Contractor Vs DCIT (ITAT Amritsar)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pankaj Jindal Contractor Vs DCIT (ITAT Amritsar) Reopening After Four Years Quashed as Change of Opinion — Disallowance Under Section 40A(3) and Addition Under Section 68 Set Aside The Amritsar Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal in full and quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated under Sections 147/148 for A.Y. 2014-15, holding them to be invalid as a mere change of opinion. The assessee, a civil contractor, had originally been assessed under Section 143(3) after detailed scrutiny of cash expenses (machinery rent, carriage of material) and unsecured loans, with the AO m...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930