Follow Us:

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs, through the Registrar of Companies, Mumbai, passed an adjudication order under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013 for violation of Section 12(3)(a), read with Section 12(8), relating to non-display of the company’s name at its registered office. Following an inspection ordered in 2019 and conducted on 30 May 2019, the inspecting officer found the registered office closed and observed that the company’s name was neither painted nor affixed at the premises, constituting statutory non-compliance. Despite issuance of a show cause notice and scheduling of an e-hearing, no reply was filed and no one appeared on behalf of the company or its directors. Based on the inspection report, the Adjudicating Officer held the company and its officers in default liable and imposed a penalty of ₹1,000 each. The order also clarified that Section 446B was inapplicable, directed rectification of the default, prescribed timelines for payment, and outlined appeal and recovery consequences.

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS
ROC Mumbai
Registrar Of Companies, 100, Everest, Marine Drive, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India, 400002
Phone: 022-22812627,022-22812645
E-mail: roc.mumbai@mca.gov.in

Order ID: PO/ADJ/12-2025/MB/01304 Dated: 31/12/2025

ORDER FOR ADJUDICATION OF PENALTY UNDER SECTION 454 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 (‘THE ACT’) FOR VIOLATION OF SECTION 12(8) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013.

A. Appointment of Adjudicating Officer:

Ministry of Corporate Affairs vide its Gazette notification number S.O. 831(E) dated 24/03/2015 appointed undersigned as Adjudicating Officer in exercise of the powers conferred by section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013 [herein after known as Act] read with Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014 for adjudging penalties under the provisions of this Act.

B. Company details:

In the matter relating to PANACHE FURNITURE AND INTERIORS PRIVATE LIMITED [herein after known as Company] bearing CIN U74110MH2016PTC272567, is a company registered with this office under the Provisions of the Companies Act, 2013/1956 having its registered office situated at GROUND PLUS 1ST FLOOR, RAIMASTER COMPOUND, B/S SHRI DURGA WEIGH BRIDGE, MANPADA G.B.ROA D,THANE(W) NA THANE THANE MAHARASHTRA INDIA 400607

Individual details:

In the matter relating to MEHFOOZ KHAN ———

In the matter relating to RAJESH RAMESH INDULKAR ——-

C. Provisions of the Act:

If any default is made in complying with the requirements of this section, the company and every officer who is in default shall be liable to a penalty of one thousand rupees for every day during which the default continues but not exceeding one lakh rupees

D. Facts about the case:

1. Default committed by the officers in default/noticee – Whereas, the Ministry vide its letter F. No. 3/726/2018-CL-II(WR) dated 01.01.2019 had ordered an Inspection in the matter of the subject company. Accordingly, the Inspection was carried out and an Inspection Report was submitted on 03.03.2021.

Whereas Section 12(3)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that, Every Company shall – paint or affix its name, and the address of its registered office, and keep the same painted or affixed, on the outside of every office or place in which its business is carried on, in a conspicuous position, in legible letters, and if the characters employed therefor are not those of the language or of one of the languages in general use in that locality, also in the characters of that language or of one of those languages.

Whereas the IO visited the registered office of the Company situated at Ground Plus 1st Floor, Raimaster Compound, B/s Shri. Durga Weigh Bridge, Manpada, G.B. Road, Thane (W), Thane, Maharashtra ? 400607 for physical verification on 30.05.2019 and found it to be closed. The IO further observed that, the name of the company was not affixed or painted anywhere at the given address in contravention of the provisions of section 12(3)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013.

2. No reply was received from the Noticees on E-adjudication Portal. Thus, the Adjudicating Officer accorded an opportunity of being heard to the Company and its Officers in default under the provisions of Section 454(4) of the Act. Accordingly, an E-hearing was scheduled on 24.12.2025.

E. Order:

1. A. A Show Cause notice bearing ID: SCN/ADJ/08-2025/MB/02423 dated 15.10.2025 was issued to Company and its Officers in default viz.Mr. MEHFOOZ KHAN (Director) and Mr. RAJESH RAMESH INDULKAR (Director) (hereinafter referred to as the noticees) under Section 454 read with Section 12(8) of the Act.

B. No reply was received from the Noticees on E-adjudication Portal. Thus, the Adjudicating Officer accorded an opportunity of being heard to the Company and its Officers in default under the provisions of Section 454(4) of the Act. Accordingly, an E-hearing was scheduled on 24.12.2025 at 02:41 PM (IST) and notice bearing ID: EH/ADJ/12-2025/MB/00975 dated 17.12.2025 was issued for the same.

C. No one attended the scheduled E-hearing.

D. On the basis of Inspection report, it is observed that the Company failed to paint or affix its name anywhere at its registered office mentioned at Para D of this order, in contravention of the provisions of section 12(3)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013. The period of default is considered the date of physical verification of the Registered Office of the Company carried out by the IO that is 30.05.2019. Thus, the Company and its Officers in default shall be liable to a penalty of Rs. 1000/- under the provisions of Section 12(8) for default of Section 12(3)(a) of the Act.

E. In the instant case, cause of action i.e. date of default is 30.05.2019. accordingly, Section 446B shall not be applicable as the said section became applicable to the provisions other than section 92(5), 117(2) and 137(3) of the Act, after 22.01.2021 i.e. the date on which Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020 commenced.

F. Now, in exercise of the powers conferred on the Adjudicating Officer vide Notification dated 24th March 2015, I hereby impose a penalty of Rs. 1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand only) each on the Company and its Officers in default viz. Mr. MEHFOOZ KHAN (Director) and Mr. RAJESH RAMESH INDULKAR (Director) under Section 12(8) of the Act.

2. The details of penalty imposed on the company, officers in default and others are shown in the table below:

(A) Name of person on whom penalty imposed (B) Rectification of Default required

(C)

Penalty Amount

(D)

Additional Penalty (E) (*Per day of continuing default i.e. date of rectification of default less order issue date) Maximum limit for Penalty (F)
1 PANACHE FURNITURE AND INTERIORS PRIVATE LIMITED having CIN as U74110MH2016P TC272567 Noticees are directed to paint or affix its name of the Company anywhere at its registered office as required under the provisions of Section 12(3)(a) of the Act 1000 0 100000
2 MEHFOOZ

KHAN having DIN as 06714030

Noticees are directed to paint or affix its name of the Company anywhere at its registered office as required under the provisions of Section 12(3)(a) of the Act 1000 0 100000
3 RAJESH
RAMESH
INDULKAR
having DIN as
07025568
Noticees are directed to paint or affix its name of the Company anywhere at its registered office as required under the provisions of Section 12(3)(a) of the Act 1000 0 100000

3. The notified officers in default/noticee shall rectify the default mentioned above and pay the penalty, so applicable within 90 days of receipt of the order.

4. The notified officers in default/noticee shall pay the penalty amount via ‘e-Adjudication’ facility which can be accessed through the respective login IDs on the website of Ministry of Corporate Affairs and upload the copy of paid challan / SRN of e-filing (if applicable) on the ‘e-Adjudication’ portal itself. It is also directed that the penalty so imposed upon the officers in default shall be paid from their personal sources/income.

5. Appeal against this order may be filed in writing with the Regional Director, RD Mumbai within a period of sixty days from the date of receipt of this order, in Form ADJ setting for the grounds of appeal and shall be accompanied by a certified copy of this order [Section 454 (5) & 454 (6) of the Act, read with Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014].

6. For penal consequences of non-payment of penalty within the prescribed time limit, please refer Section 454(8) of the Companies Act, 2013.

Chandan Kumar,
Registrar of Companies
ROC Mumbai

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031