Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nandu Atmaram Wajekar Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Nandu Atmaram Wajekar Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) IDS Default Comes Back to Bite: ITAT Pune Upholds ₹69.54 L Penalty u/s 271AAC Declare, But Don’t Pay? IDS Shield Lost, 271AAC Penalty Sustained In Nandu Atmaram Wajekar vs. ACIT, Panvel (ITA No.67/PUN/2025, AY 2017-18; order dated 29-12-2025), the Pune Bench “A” of ITAT dismissed the Assessee’s appeal and upheld penalty of ₹69,54,070 levied u/s 271AAC(1) of the Income-tax Act. The Assessee had declared undisclosed income of ₹11.59 crore under Income Declar ation Scheme (IDS), 2016, but failed to pay tax, surcharge & penalty within the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Approval from PCIT Instead of PCCIT Renders Section 148 Notice Invalid View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930