Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nandu Atmaram Wajekar Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Nandu Atmaram Wajekar Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) IDS Default Comes Back to Bite: ITAT Pune Upholds ₹69.54 L Penalty u/s 271AAC Declare, But Don’t Pay? IDS Shield Lost, 271AAC Penalty Sustained In Nandu Atmaram Wajekar vs. ACIT, Panvel (ITA No.67/PUN/2025, AY 2017-18; order dated 29-12-2025), the Pune Bench “A” of ITAT dismissed the Assessee’s appeal and upheld penalty of ₹69,54,070 levied u/s 271AAC(1) of the Income-tax Act. The Assessee had declared undisclosed income of ₹11.59 crore under Income Declar ation Scheme (IDS), 2016, but failed to pay tax, surcharge & penalty within the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031