Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sanjeev Kumar Nalam Hyderabad Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sanjeev Kumar Nalam Hyderabad Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Wrong Sanction, No Jurisdiction: Hyderabad ITAT Quashes Reassessment Issued Beyond 3 Years for Want of Approval u/s 151(ii) Hyderabad ITAT (B-Bench) in Shri Sanjeev Kumar Nalam vs. ITO, Ward-1, Adilabad (ITA No.669/Hyd/2025, AY 2017-18, order dated 19.12.2025) quashed the reassessment framed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 on the sole legal ground of lack of valid sanction u/s 151. The Tribunal held that the notice u/s 148 dated 29.07.2022 was issued beyond three years from the end of the relevant AY and yet approval was taken only from the Principal Co...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031