Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shakti Hormann Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Shakti Hormann Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)

144C Is Not a Time-Extender: TP Assessment Quashed as Time-Barred- Draft Order in Time Won’t Save Final Order: DRP Route Can’t Beat Section 153;

The Hyderabad ITAT allowed the Assessee’s appeal on the legal issue and quashed the final assessment order as time-barred, holding that Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Bogus Purchase Cases: Only Profit Element Taxable; 4% GP Addition Upheld on ₹5.79 Cr Purchases Recorded Sales Cannot Be Taxed Again u/s 68; Additions Based Only on Third-Party Statement Deleted Final Orders After DRP Beyond Section 153 Limit Quashed Despite Pending Supreme Court Reference Cash Advance Adjusted Through Tripartite Deal Not Unexplained Cash Credit u/s 68 Final Assessment Ignoring DRP Directions Held Void; No Post-Limitation Cure Permissible View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031