Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Muzafar Ahmad Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Amritsar)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Muzafar Ahmad Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Amritsar) 893-Day Delay Condoned; Cash Deposits Can’t Be Split Arbitrarily – Profit Estimated at 6% Amritsar ITAT  condoned an extraordinary delay of 893 days in filing appeal and granted substantive relief on merits by rationalising profit estimation and deleting separate cash addition. The appeal arose from a best judgment assessment u/s 144, where AO treated bank deposits of ₹171.36 lakh as business receipts, applied 8% profit rate on non-cash deposits, and separately added cash deposits of ₹10.03 lakh as unexplained. CIT(A) partly reduced the additi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031