Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Muzafar Ahmad Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Amritsar)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Muzafar Ahmad Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Amritsar) 893-Day Delay Condoned; Cash Deposits Can’t Be Split Arbitrarily – Profit Estimated at 6% Amritsar ITAT  condoned an extraordinary delay of 893 days in filing appeal and granted substantive relief on merits by rationalising profit estimation and deleting separate cash addition. The appeal arose from a best judgment assessment u/s 144, where AO treated bank deposits of ₹171.36 lakh as business receipts, applied 8% profit rate on non-cash deposits, and separately added cash deposits of ₹10.03 lakh as unexplained. CIT(A) partly reduced the additi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Approval from PCIT Instead of PCCIT Renders Section 148 Notice Invalid View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930