Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nanda Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Nanda Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur)

ITAT Raipur Quashes Reassessment — Unsigned 143(2) Notice Violates Mandatory Signature Under Section 282A(1); Deeming Authentication in Section 282A(2) Cannot Cure Defect

The Tribunal held that the notice u/s 143(2) dated 05.07.2018 was completely unsigned, and even the screenshot of the notice was unsigned, causing a direct violation of Section 282A(1), which mandates that every notice “shall be signed.” Applying the Bench’s own ruling in Smt. Shobha Dubey, the ITAT clarified that Section 282A(2)—which provides a d

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Experienced professional with over 3 years of Post qualification experience in handling Assessments, dealing CIT(A) and ITAT Appeals. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Central Circle Not Exempt from Faceless Reassessment Regime: ITAT Hyderabad Appeal Dismissal for Non-Prosecution Invalid When Notices Sent to Wrong Email Address Telangana HC Quashes Section 148 Unsigned Reassessment Notice ITAT Hyderabad Dropped Penalties When Compliance Made Before Assessment Ends ₹3.49 Cr Cash Seizure Backed by Cash Book & Debtor Realisations: ITAT Deletes Sec 69A Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031