Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jagdish Chand Verma Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jagdish Chand Verma Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Delhi Allows Section 54 for Property Purchased in Australia & Bank passbook is not books of accounts , a pre-condition to make addition u/s 68 In this case, Assessee, a 70-year-old retired bank employee who shifted to Australia in 2013, sold his Delhi flat for ₹70 lakh & earned LTCG of ₹54,35,000. He deposited ₹40,51,000 in his bank account from sale of household items & cash belonging to his spouse & son. Assessment was completed ex-parte u/s 144 with two additions: denial of exemption u/s 54 for purchase of a new house in Au...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031