The Jharkhand High Court granted bail in an alleged fake GST ITC case after considering that the petitioner had remained in custody for more than four months. The Court imposed conditions requiring cooperation with the trial and non-interference with witnesses.
The Allahabad High Court held that fixing the personal hearing and the last date for filing a reply on the same day violated the principles of natural justice. The GST adjudication order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh proceedings.
The Delhi High Court held that a reassessment notice issued beyond the prescribed limitation period was without jurisdiction. It quashed both the Section 148 notice and the consequential assessment order.
The ITAT Hyderabad held that certified segmental financial information could not be rejected mechanically without identifying defects. It remanded the issue to the TPO for fresh consideration.
The Allahabad High Court set aside the rejection of a passport renewal NOC after noting prolonged delays in criminal proceedings and directed issuance of the NOC while also examining compliance with earlier judicial directions.
The Patna High Court declined to interfere with the cancellation of GST registration after noting that the first appeal was filed with a delay of 21 months. The Court also observed that no reasons for the delay were placed on record and left open the remedy of a second appeal.
The DRAT upheld the DRT’s refusal to accept the settlement after finding that the bank had not complied with the final order directing refund to the auction purchaser. Both the borrower and the bank’s appeals were dismissed.
The NCLT admitted a Section 7 insolvency application after finding that the Corporate Debtor had acknowledged its liability under the corporate guarantee. The Tribunal held that financial debt and default were established, leading to initiation of CIRP.
The Karnataka High Court disposed of the writ petition after noting that the respondent company had entered the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The petitioner was granted liberty to revive the matter depending on the outcome before the NCLT.
High Court held that the Company Court may transfer pending winding-up proceedings after applying its judicial mind where the proceedings have not reached an irreversible stage. The appeal challenging the transfer failed.
