The order emphasizes that delayed filing may regularize compliance but does not extinguish the offence committed during the period of default. Penalties remain payable for the duration of the continuing contravention.
The ROC held that filing Form PAS-6 after the statutory deadline does not erase the period of default. The company and its directors remained liable for penalties until the date compliance was actually achieved.
The ROC used the residuary penalty provision under Section 450 to address procedural contraventions involving premature allotment and inaccurate PAS-3 disclosures. The ruling clarifies the scope of Section 450 in filling legislative gaps.
The adjudicating authority held that filing Form PAS-6 after the due date does not wipe out the period of default. Maximum penalties were imposed on the company and its directors for prolonged non-compliance.
ICSI announced that its 2026 elections will be conducted through an online preferential voting system, marking a global first for a professional body and advancing transparency, accessibility, and member participation.
The Allahabad High Court ruled that ordinary land disputes involving allegations of cheating cannot attract the Gangsters Act without evidence of organized criminal activity. The judgment underscores that mere assertions by police are insufficient to invoke stringent anti-gang provisions.
Learn what TAN is, who must obtain it, how to apply, and where it must be quoted under the Income-tax Act. The guide also explains exemptions, duplicate TAN rules, penalties, and compliance requirements.
Karthik Papers Limited Vs Commercial Tax Officer (CESTAT Delhi) The appeal was filed by Shree Karthik Papers Limited against the portion of the order dated 16.09.2014 passed by the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Additional Bench), Coimbatore, which restored the assessment on a turnover of ₹1,51,28,219 as inter-State sales and restored penalty of ₹25,64,365. […]
P P Jewellers & Diamonds Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) (CESTAT Delhi) The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Delhi, examined multiple appeals challenging an order dated 08.01.2024 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), Jodhpur. The Commissioner had confiscated seized silver jewellery, confirmed a customs duty demand of ₹1,44,04,165 along […]
Sanand Properties P. Ltd. Vs Jt. Commr. of I.T. Range 6 And Ors. (Supreme Court of India) Reopening of Assessment Valid Because Survey Unearthed Fresh Tangible Material: SC; 35% Share Taxable as Revenue Since Expenses Never Reduced Entitlement: SC; Receipts Linked to Gross Sales Held Taxable as Business Income, Not Profit Share; Assessment Reopening Sustained […]
