Tribunal held that Section 87A rebate is linked to total income, which includes short-term capital gains. CPC’s denial of rebate on Section 111A gains was therefore unsustainable for AY 2024-25.
The ITAT held that income disclosed during a survey could not be reclassified from business income to Section 69A income through rectification proceedings. A debatable issue cannot be treated as a mistake apparent from the record.
The ITAT Lucknow held that acute depression prevented timely compliance with statutory notices and amounted to a reasonable cause under Section 273B. Consequently, the penalty under Section 272A(1)(d) was deleted.
The Tribunal held that once immunity under Section 270AA was granted and the assessee accepted the assessment without appeal, the Assessing Officer could not later alter the assessment through Section 154 rectification. The ruling reinforces the finality and certainty intended by the immunity scheme.
GSTN has made Ship-To GSTIN reporting mandatory in Bill-To/Ship-To transactions to accurately capture the actual recipient of goods. The change aims to strengthen reconciliation, compliance monitoring, and transparency in goods movement.
The Supreme Court ruled that High Courts should ordinarily pronounce reserved judgments within three months. The decision aims to curb judicial delays and protect litigants’ right to timely justice.
The article questions whether tree-planting claims linked to IPL dot balls are supported by verifiable evidence. It highlights the need for stronger ESG accountability and third-party validation.
NSE has clarified that regulatory exemptions available for Section 31 IBC resolution plans do not extend to plans approved under Section 54L in the PPIRP framework. Listed entities must comply with all applicable SEBI requirements.
The Registrar of Companies penalized the company and its authorized signatory after an incorrect document was attached with Form AOC-4. The order held that filing defective statutory records constitutes a contravention despite subsequent rectification requests.
The Tribunal found that the dispute could only be resolved through a detailed reconciliation of journal vouchers and tax returns. The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for verification.
