Every year, the Indian Premier League (IPL) attracts hundreds of millions of viewers. It is not merely a cricket tournament; it is one of the most influential marketing platforms in the country. Therefore, when the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and its corporate partners announce sustainability initiatives during the IPL, the message reaches an audience far larger than most environmental campaigns could ever hope to achieve.
One such initiative was the Green Dot Ball Pledge. The concept was simple and attractive: for every dot ball bowled during the IPL playoffs, trees would be planted. The campaign later evolved with expanded commitments linked to environmental sustainability. On the surface, the initiative appeared to combine sport, public engagement, and environmental responsibility in a way that was easy for audiences to understand.
Yet the campaign also raises a deeper question about Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) commitments in India: Are such initiatives creating meaningful environmental impact, or are they merely symbolic gestures designed to improve public perception?
The answer lies at the heart of what may be called India’s ESG illusion.
Page Contents
The Rise of ESG Storytelling
Over the past decade, ESG has become a dominant framework for evaluating corporate responsibility. Investors, regulators, and consumers increasingly expect companies to demonstrate commitments beyond profits. Environmental sustainability, social impact, and governance standards have become essential elements of corporate reputation.
In response, businesses have embraced ESG narratives. Sustainability reports have grown thicker, climate pledges have become more ambitious, and environmental campaigns have become increasingly visible.
The IPL pledge fits perfectly within this trend. It converts environmental action into a simple metric that audiences can instantly understand. Every dot ball becomes a symbol of environmental contribution. Every match appears to create measurable ecological value.
From a communications perspective, it is brilliant.
From an ESG perspective, however, the important question is not how many trees are promised but whether the initiative creates lasting environmental outcomes.
The Tree-Planting Problem
Tree planting has become the default solution in corporate sustainability campaigns worldwide. It offers attractive numbers and easy publicity. Announcing the planting of thousands or millions of trees creates positive headlines and generates goodwill.
However, environmental experts have repeatedly pointed out that tree planting is not the same as forest creation.
A sapling planted today does not automatically become a mature tree. Survival rates vary significantly depending on location, species selection, maintenance, water availability, and long-term monitoring. In many cases, a substantial percentage of planted saplings fail to survive beyond a few years.
This creates a critical distinction between:
- Trees promised
- Trees planted
- Trees surviving
- Trees contributing to ecological restoration
Most public campaigns focus on the first two metrics because they are easier to communicate. The latter two are harder to measure and often receive less attention.
Consequently, environmental success is frequently reported through impressive planting figures while long-term ecological outcomes remain uncertain.
Visibility Versus Accountability
The IPL pledge highlights a broader challenge within ESG practices.
Modern ESG initiatives often prioritize visibility over accountability. The more visible a project is, the more likely it is to attract media coverage and public approval. Yet visibility does not necessarily correlate with effectiveness.
A televised sustainability campaign can generate millions of impressions. But impressions are not environmental outcomes.
True ESG performance requires answers to difficult questions:
- Where were the trees planted?
- What species were selected?
- What is the survival rate after one year?
- What is the survival rate after five years?
- Who verifies the results?
- Are independent audits conducted?
- Is the project restoring ecosystems or merely increasing plantation numbers?
Without transparent reporting on these questions, environmental pledges risk becoming marketing exercises rather than sustainability achievements.
India’s Broader ESG Challenge
The IPL campaign reflects a wider pattern in India’s ESG landscape.
Many organizations have become skilled at announcing sustainability commitments. Carbon neutrality targets, renewable energy ambitions, water conservation projects, biodiversity programs, and afforestation drives are increasingly common.
However, disclosure quality often varies significantly.
The challenge is not the absence of ESG activity. Rather, it is the gap between commitments and measurable outcomes.
India has witnessed several examples where environmental claims generated substantial publicity while independent verification remained limited. This does not necessarily imply bad faith. Often, organizations genuinely wish to contribute positively. The problem is that ESG success is frequently measured by announcements instead of outcomes.
As a result, stakeholders may develop an inflated perception of environmental progress.
This creates what can be termed an ESG illusion: a situation where sustainability appears more advanced than it actually is because communication outpaces measurable impact.
The Legal Dimension: ESG Is No Longer Voluntary
The debate around initiatives such as the IPL Green Dot Ball Pledge must also be viewed through the lens of India’s emerging ESG regulatory framework. What was once largely a matter of corporate philanthropy and voluntary sustainability reporting is increasingly becoming a subject of legal and regulatory scrutiny.
1. SEBI’s Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting (BRSR)
The most significant ESG-related regulatory development in India is the introduction of the Business Responsibility and Sustainability Report (BRSR) framework by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI).
Under SEBI’s Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements (LODR) framework, the top listed companies by market capitalization are required to disclose information relating to environmental, social and governance performance. The BRSR framework seeks quantitative disclosures on areas such as:
- Greenhouse gas emissions
- Energy consumption
- Water usage
- Waste management
- Employee welfare
- Diversity and inclusion
- Governance practices
The objective is to move corporate sustainability reporting from broad claims to measurable outcomes.
2. BRSR Core and Assurance Requirements
SEBI has further strengthened ESG disclosures through the concept of BRSR Core, which focuses on a set of key performance indicators requiring reasonable assurance and verification.
This development is particularly relevant in the context of tree-planting and sustainability campaigns. Under the evolving framework, companies are increasingly expected not merely to announce environmental initiatives but to provide verifiable data regarding outcomes and impact.
In the future, claims regarding afforestation, carbon reduction or environmental restoration may face greater scrutiny from investors, regulators and assurance providers.
3. Companies Act, 2013 and CSR Obligations
Many sustainability initiatives are undertaken as part of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activities under Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013.
The CSR regime requires qualifying companies to spend a prescribed percentage of their average net profits on eligible social and environmental activities. Schedule VII of the Act specifically includes:
- Environmental sustainability
- Ecological balance
- Protection of flora and fauna
- Conservation of natural resources
While tree plantation projects may qualify as CSR activities, the legal emphasis is increasingly shifting from expenditure-based reporting to impact-based assessment.
4. Greenwashing and Regulatory Risk
Globally, regulators are becoming increasingly concerned about “greenwashing”—the practice of making environmental claims that are exaggerated, misleading or inadequately substantiated.
Although India does not yet have a comprehensive anti-greenwashing statute, several legal frameworks may become relevant where environmental claims are misleading:
- Consumer Protection Act, 2019
- Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) Guidelines
- SEBI disclosure requirements
- Companies Act reporting obligations
As ESG investing grows, inaccurate sustainability claims may expose organizations to reputational, regulatory and even litigation risks.
5. Environmental Laws Focus on Outcomes, Not Announcements
India’s environmental statutes, including:
- Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
- Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
- Biological Diversity Act, 2002
- Compensatory Afforestation Fund Act, 2016
are fundamentally outcome-oriented. They focus on environmental protection, conservation and restoration rather than promotional commitments.
This distinction is important. A pledge to plant trees may generate positive publicity, but environmental governance ultimately depends upon measurable ecological outcomes, survival rates, biodiversity enhancement and long-term sustainability.
ESG’s Next Evolution
India’s ESG framework is gradually moving from a regime of promises to a regime of proof. Investors increasingly demand data. Regulators increasingly seek disclosures. Assurance providers increasingly verify sustainability claims.
In this environment, the success of initiatives such as the IPL Green Dot Ball Pledge will ultimately be judged not by the number of trees promised but by the evidence demonstrating that those trees survived, contributed to ecological restoration and created measurable environmental value.
Why Symbolic Actions Still Matter
Critics often dismiss campaigns like the IPL pledge as mere greenwashing. That assessment may be too simplistic.
Symbolic initiatives do have value.
The IPL reaches audiences that environmental organizations often struggle to engage. By associating cricket with sustainability, the campaign helps normalize environmental discussions among millions of viewers. It creates awareness and encourages public participation.
The problem arises when symbolism is mistaken for impact.
Awareness is valuable, but awareness alone does not reduce emissions. Public engagement is important, but engagement alone does not restore ecosystems.
Symbolic campaigns should therefore be viewed as a starting point rather than an endpoint.
What Genuine ESG Leadership Looks Like
If organizations genuinely wish to demonstrate environmental leadership, the next phase must focus on measurable outcomes.
Instead of merely announcing tree-planting targets, ESG disclosures should include:
- Independent third-party verification.
- Survival-rate reporting.
- Geotagged plantation data.
- Biodiversity impact assessments.
- Carbon sequestration estimates.
- Long-term maintenance commitments.
- Annual progress reports.
Such disclosures may attract less publicity initially, but they create greater credibility over time.
The future of ESG will belong not to those who make the biggest promises but to those who provide the most reliable evidence.
Beyond the Green Dot Ball
The Green Dot Ball Pledge succeeded in capturing public attention. It transformed a routine cricket statistic into a symbol of environmental responsibility and demonstrated how sport can be used as a platform for sustainability messaging.
Yet the campaign also serves as a reminder that environmental responsibility cannot be measured solely through attractive slogans or large numerical commitments.
India’s ESG journey is entering a more mature phase. Investors, regulators, consumers, and civil society increasingly expect evidence rather than promises. The era of sustainability by announcement is gradually giving way to sustainability by verification.
The real test is not how many trees are pledged during a cricket tournament.
The real test is how many survive, how ecosystems improve, and whether measurable environmental outcomes can be demonstrated years after the applause has faded.
Until that transition occurs, initiatives like the IPL pledge will continue to symbolize both the promise of ESG in India and the illusion that often accompanies it.
