Calcutta High Court dismisses a writ petition from Tara Lohia Private Limited, challenging a GST order. The court ruled that the petitioner failed to provide supporting documents for input tax credit claims, upholding the tax authority’s decision.
The Madras High Court ruled that a GST-registered firm cannot claim ignorance of GST rules or the validity of notices served via the GST portal. A petitioner’s adverse order was conditionally quashed, requiring a 25% deposit of the disputed tax amount.
Uttarakhand High Court allows Ashu Enterprises to seek GST registration revocation after cancellation for non-filing, setting conditions for pending returns and payments
The Supreme Court of India ruled that a Section 95 IBC plea was not time-barred, as the limitation period was extended by debt acknowledgment under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
The Gauhati High Court has ruled that a summary of a show cause notice is not a valid substitute for a formal notice under Section 74(1) of the CGST Act. The court quashed an order against Air Transport Corporation Assam, reinforcing a prior ruling.
The ITAT Delhi has upheld the deletion of a ₹11.73 Cr addition for unexplained cash credit, ruling that the Assessing Officer’s reliance on unverified STR information was insufficient to make the addition.
The Madras High Court directed Sri Mahalakshmi Construction to deposit 5% of the disputed tax from its Electronic Cash Register to secure a final hearing, as the petitioner had failed to attend previous hearings.
The ITAT Cuttack has remanded a case involving a ₹9 lakh cash deposit to the CIT(A), granting the assessee one final opportunity to produce evidence after a delay of 302 days due to illness.
ITAT Chandigarh dismisses revenue’s appeal, affirming partial interest disallowance for Mahesh Kumar Goyal based on consistency with prior assessment years
The Madras High Court ruled that short-term capital gains from the sale of depreciable business assets can be set off against brought forward business losses, citing a similar Bombay High Court judgment.
