Sh. Ishwar Chand Proprietor of M/S Bhagwati Trading Co. Vs Union of India (Delhi High Court) The controversy in the present petition relates to levy of penalty for late filing of the GST returns, for the period the petitioner was disabled from doing so, on account of cancellation of its GSTIN registration. It is the […]
Rohit Kapur Vs PCIT (Delhi High Court) The proviso to Sub-section(4) of Section 270AA of the Act makes it amply clear that before an application is rejected, the applicant must be given an opportunity of being heard. In the present case, there is no dispute that the petitioner was not afforded the said opportunity. In […]
Impugned notice is quashed as it was issued in the name of non-existing company in spite of revenue having notice & knowledge of non-existence of such Company.
Harish Tex Mach Pvt Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad) In terms of Notification No. 6/2005-ST, the exemption was provided upto the aggregate value of Rs. 4 lakh in the year 2005-06, 2006-07 and Rs. 8 Lakh in the year 2007-08 and 2008-09. Accordingly, the value of taxable services of the […]
Isolux Corsan Power Concession India Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) In this case AO has treated Interest income as Income from other sources as Business of Assessee was not set-up in the year under consideration and held as follows:- In the present case, the appellant has miserably failed to demonstrate that during the year […]
‘e-Way bills’ expired during transit and petitioner was not in a position to ask for its renewal to competent authority when vehicle entered into territory of State of Tripura.
Section 73 and 74 of CGST Act also provide for recovery of refund where the same has been erroneously granted.
Assessing Officer cannot accept the income for tax purpose and refuse to allow credit of corresponding TDS. Both must go hand in hand.
Y Screens Entertainment (India) Ltd Vs Government of AP (Andhra Pradesh HC) Issue- 3rd respondent cancelled the GST Registration of the petitioner for non filing of returns for a period of six months. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner filed appeal before the 2nd respondent and vide order in Special Appeal which was dismissed on the ground that […]
GST registration cannot be cancelled for allegedly being a bogus firm as it is not a ground enumerated under Section 29(2) of GST Act
