In continuation of this Ministry’s General Circular No. 10/2015 dated 13.07.2015, keeping in view the request received from various stakeholders, it has been decided to relax the additional fee payable on forms AOC-4 and AOC-4 XBRI upto 30th November, 2015, The additional fee requirement for MGT-7 E-Form is also relaxed for all such forms filed till 30th Novernber, 2015, wherever additional fee is applicable.
Self Assessment Tax alongwith interest is required to be deposited before furnishing the return of income and the proof of such payment should be attached with the return of income. Note 1: Where the amount paid by the assessee under section 140A is less than the amount required to be paid under section 140A, then […]
ITAT Ahmedabad held In the case of UTI Bank Ltd. vs. ACIT that we find that the assessee’s interest free deposits exceed its tax free investment in current year as well as in succeeding assessment year 2003-04. The tribunal and hon’ble jurisdictional high court deleted an identical section 14A disallowance based on the very presumption.
ITAT Chandigarh held In the case of DCIT vs. M/s Smart Value Product & Services Ltd. that no defects in the purchases and sales have been pointed out by the AO. The assessee produced complete books of account, sales and purchase vouchers.
It has been decided to relax the additional fee payable on forms AOC-4 and AOC-4 XBRL upto 30th November, 2015. The additional fee requirement for MGT-7 E-Form is also relaxed for all such forms filed till 30th November, 2015, wherever additional fee is applicable.
M/s Vels Institute of Science Technology & Advanced Studies Vs. DDIT (E)- ITAT Chennai- Section 13(1)(a) says that if any part of the property or income of the Trust is given to the interested person without either adequate security or adequate interest
Delhi High Court held In the case of Principal CIT vs. G & G Pharma India Ltd. that this is basic requirement of law u/s 147 that before reopening of assessment, AO must have apply his mind to the available materials
Delhi High Court held In the case of CIT vs. M/s Escorts Ltd. that in view of the nature of the conduct displayed by Sh. Gupta, i.e. preferring an application for intervention which was rejected, being Intervener Application No. 5779/2008
Supreme Court held In the case of M/s. Mangalore Ganesh Beedi Works vs. CIT that Act does not clothe the taxing authorities with any power or jurisdiction to re-write the terms of the agreement arrived at between the parties with each other at arm’s length
Delhi High Court held In the case of Vodafone South Ltd. vs. CIT that the netting of the interest paid on the borrowed sum against the interest income earned is allowed. There was a direct nexus between the earning of interest on the loan advanced by the Assessee and payment of interest to the bank.
