Court held that Covid-19 exclusion period applies to all judicial and quasi-judicial proceedings. It confirmed that limitation under Sections 73 and 74 remains extended based on Supreme Court’s directions.
The Court ruled that an effective hearing is mandatory under Section 73 of the WBGST Act. The impugned order was quashed, allowing the petitioner to file a reply and contest the tax determination.
ITAT Chennai holds that Section 87A rebate is available even when total income includes capital gains taxed at special rates, reversing CIT(A)’s denial.
The court held that a taxpayer whose GST registration was cancelled for not filing returns for six months can seek restoration by submitting pending returns and paying dues within the prescribed rules.
The Tribunal held that VAT input credit shown only in the balance sheet cannot be taxed as income. It upheld deletion of VAT, commission, and notional interest additions, dismissing the revenue’s appeal.
The Tribunal found that the addition was inferential and lacked corroborative evidence of concealment. It concluded that penalty under section 271(1)(c) could not be sustained.
The High Court ruled that a protest deposit must be considered toward the statutory 10% pre-deposit. The dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance was set aside.
Tribunal held that interest disallowance for non-deduction of TDS must be restricted to 30% under amended provisions. It also remanded issue of estimated interest on interest-free advances for verification.
The High Court set aside the Tribunal’s order after finding it failed to consider binding rulings on DGFT authority and import restrictions under the FTDR Act. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication based on established legal principles.
The Bombay High Court condoned a 338-day delay in filing Form No. 10 for income accumulation under Section 11(2), holding that genuine hardship justified relaxation of procedural deadlines.
