ITAT held that bank deposits consistent with declared fruit business turnover cannot be treated as unexplained under section 68; the addition of ₹1.29 crore was directed to be treated as genuine receipts.
Tribunal invalidated the reassessment because the Assessing Officer failed to obtain mandatory approval from the specified authority under Section 151(ii), rendering the Section 148 notice void.
NCLAT Delhi held that the admission of the Claim by the Resolution Professional in the first CIRP against the Corporate Debtor constituted a valid acknowledgement. Accordingly, order of adjudicating authority confirmed and appeals dismissed.
Delhi High Court held that person aggrieved by the provisional attachment order passed by the Adjudicating Authority should prefer an appeal to Appellate Tribunal under section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 [PMLA]. Accordingly, writ petition disposed of.
The Court held that revocation of a LoI without reasons violated natural justice. It reaffirmed that contractual rights must be protected when parties have relied on government approvals in public procurement.
The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 406/420 IPC, holding that no prima facie case existed against the accused. The ruling highlights that civil disputes cannot be turned into vindictive criminal cases.
The Supreme Court held that failure to issue notice under Section 7(5)(b) IBC invalidates NCLT rejection; defective affidavits alone do not nullify applications.
Bombay High Court held that dispute between SEBI and petitioner regarding opening of Demat Account in fictitious and benami name and making of large applications in IPO is settled and the said dispute is predominantly commercial in nature having little criminal overtone. Hence, order quashed and set aside.
Allahabad High Court held that filing of writ petition only with intent to evade pre-deposit of 10% as provided in Goods and Services Tax Act is incorrect. Accordingly, petition is misconceived and is dismissed.
Gujarat High Court held that crude palm kernel oil edible grade eligible for exemption in terms of entry 33A/57 of exemption notification. Accordingly, show cause notice is quashed and set aside.
