These two appeals have been filed by the appellant against the common impugned order dated 2.8.2017 passed by the Commissioner (A) whereby the Commissioner (A) has disposed of four Orders-in-Original.
The appeal by the Revenue is against order dated 27.04.2012 of Commissioner of Service Tax, New Delhi. By the said order, he original authority dropped the entire demand of Service Tax of Rs.93,01,154/-covering the period 2006-07 to 2008-09 with reference to construction project of Delhi Haat in INA and Pitampura .
These two appeals filed by the assessee relate to the assessment years 2012-13 & 2013-14. Since common issue is raised in both the appeals, we are, therefore, proceeding to dispose them off by this consolidated order for the sake of convenience.
Belated cross-objections– by over four years, in the opinion of the Court, meant that the appellants were seeking to rake up stale issues for which they had accepted the finality as regards their tax liability.
In the case of Sun mac Enterprises vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise, the Madras High Court held that inability to pay pre- deposit of 7.5 percent before the Commissioner (Appeals) cannot be a fit ground for invoking writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
In re M/s. Shree Vishwakarma Engineering Works (AAR Gujarat) (i) The product ‘Electrically operated Drum with Bell and Zalar’ manufactured and supplied by the applicant is classifiable under Heading 9208 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. (ii) The product ‘Electrically operated Drum with Bell and Zalar’ of the applicant is not […]
I. M/s. Sammarth Overseas & Credits Pvt. Ltd., Sanathnagar, Hyderabad, (GSTIN No. 36AAGCS9604PIZ0) has filed an application and sought advance ruling on the following issues under Section 97(1) of TGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 103 of CGST/TGST Rules, 2017.
The applicant M/s. Mitora Machinex Pvt. Ltd. has submitted that they manufacture and supply the Ice Cream Making Machines’ in diverse specifications such as Automatic Ice Cream Making Machine, Countertop Ice Cream Making Machine, Soft Ice Cream Making Machine and Fully Automatic Ice Cream Making Machine..
While hearing the case of Bridge & Roof Company Limited vs. CCE, Delhi bench of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the benefit of the composition scheme cannot be denied to an assessee who has entered into contracts prior to 1.07.2007.
Pr. CIT Vs Shanti Lal Jain (Rajasthan High Court) It is an admitted position that for the purpose of getting immunity from the penalty imposed under Clause 2 of explanation 5 to section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, three conditions are required to be satisfied by the assessee. Firstly, if the assessee makes […]
