Follow Us:

Judiciary

 No Penalty U/s. 271E on conversion of the loan into equity

March 7, 2018 6546 Views 0 comment Print

The loan received by the assessee was squared off by way of conversion of loan into equity by the assessee through book entries without any physical outflow of funds. It is usual business practice and is part of routine corporate debt restructuring exercise carried out by various banks and financial institutions. Therefore, the said transaction could not be considered to be in violation of section 269T, so as to impose penalty under section 271E.

Loss on account of foreign currency fluctuations is allowable expense

March 7, 2018 2874 Views 0 comment Print

Fall in net profit rate due to dollar rate fluctuation (currency fluctuations): additions to income deleted in Indo Colchem case by Ahmedabad ITAT

Kerala HC explains What is an error apparent on the face of record

March 7, 2018 38769 Views 0 comment Print

CIT Vs. Younus Kunju (Kerala High Court) It needs no repetition that a judgmental error is not a review able error, nor can it be termed an error on the face of record. Error in reasoning or, for that matter, in applying law to facts is an appeal able error. And that power of appeal […]

CCI penalises 3 Airlines for concerted action in fixing fuel surcharge

March 7, 2018 1200 Views 0 comment Print

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) imposes penalties upon three Airlines for concerted action in fixing and revising fuel surcharge (FSC) on cargo transport The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has imposed penalties upon 3 Airlines for concerted action in fixing and revising Fuel Surcharge (FSC) – a component of freight charges. The ​F​inal O​rder was […]

Business income or capital gains on Purchase & sale of shares- ITAT adopts 30 days theory

March 6, 2018 11055 Views 0 comment Print

Gains arising from purchase and sale of shares which were squared up within 30 days of purchase would be treated as business income and if transactions were squared up after 30 days of purchase of shares same would be treated as capital gains and in the case of business income STT paid would be allowed.

S. 2(22)(e) deemed dividend not applicable on amount received from Subsidiary Co. as part of Regular Business Transactions

March 6, 2018 9534 Views 0 comment Print

CIT Vs. M/s Malayala Manorama Co. Ltd. (Kerala High Court) Amounts under the disputed heads were being received by the Assessee from its Subsidiary Company only as part of regular business transactions, which was being accounted properly. The change in circumstance, as to the distribution of dailies/publications in the Gulf, causing the same to be […]

Service Tax not payable on consideration received due to termination of arrangement

March 6, 2018 4764 Views 0 comment Print

M/s. Ford India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner (CESTAT Chennai)  Regarding the tax liability on the consideration received due to termination of the arrangement, we note that no identifiable service can be attributed for such consideration. It is rather a termination of arrangement which itself the original authority held as a service. We note that by […]

“Liability of Director after Strike off’ and ‘Wound up of Company after Strike off”

March 6, 2018 39996 Views 1 comment Print

In this flash editorial author discusses the provisions of liability of directors after strike off of Company or winding up of Company by tribunal after Struck off in the record of Registrar of Companies.

Works Contract Composition Scheme can’t be denied to Assessee merely for Failure to file any Intimation

March 6, 2018 1776 Views 0 comment Print

Vaishno Associates Vs. C.C.E. & S.T.-Jaipur (CESTAT Delhi) The activity carried out by the appellant is in the nature of Erection, Commissioning or Installation and for the disputed period i.e. 2008-09 to 2009-10, the activity will also be covered under the category of Works Contract Service (WCS) which was introduced in the statute w.e.f. 01/06/2007. […]

TDS on payment to Carrier under contracts for transporting petroleum products in business is deductible U/s. 194C and not U/s./ 194I

March 6, 2018 6168 Views 0 comment Print

Assessee is obliged to deduct tax on the payment made by it to the Carrier under the contracts for transporting the petroleum products in the business in which the respondent assessee is engaged. On the one hand, it is the case of the appellant Department that the case of the respondent assessee falls under Section 194-I of the Income Tax Act, 1961 . On the other hand, the case of the respondent assessee is that its case falls under Section 1 94C of the Act.

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031