Mumbai bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), recently upheld the book-value based taxation of partner on capital contribution of immovable property in the case of a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) and proclaimed in its recently published order.
In the case of M/s Abhipra Capital Limited vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Investigation), the Delhi High Court held that amount paid to National Stock Exchange (NSE) as non-adjustable deposit for acquisition of membership cannot be treated as revenue expenditure and the same would be termed as capital expenditure.
In re Ceat Limited (AAR Maharashtra) Applicant is engaged in the manufacturing of tyres of kind used in three-wheeled Electric-rickshaws which are used to transport goods and passengers over short distances. The applicant, M/s Ceat Ltd. has filed the application under section 97 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and requested to […]
In re Simple Rajendra Shukla (GST AAR Maharashtra) Whether Services related to providing coaching for entrance exam will come in the ambit of GST? FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA 1. The applicant Simmple Rajendra Shukla has filed the application under section 97 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, […]
The Complainant vide his RTI application sought information regarding the total amount paid to Guest House/ Houses for stay by Shri S.K. Roy, JCIT, Range-3, Bokaro during the month of October, 2016.
Ajesh Kumar Agrawal Vs. CIT (Rajasthan High Court) What is to be considered is that for being granted benefit under sub-section (37) of section 10 of the Act, the land in question should have been put to agricultural use by the assessee for the preceding two years. Even if we accept the contention of the […]
Abhay Solvents Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner of Commercial (Karnataka High Court) In terms of Section 174(1)(f), it is clear that the repeal of the Act specified in Section 173 shall not affect any proceedings including that relating to an appeal, revision, review or reference, instituted before, on or after the appointed date, under the […]
Centaur Mercantile P. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) It is undisputed that the assessee has booked bogus purchases thereby inflating work-in-progress. Hence, it is clear that the assessee was owner of undisclosed income during the year. It was because of the system of accounting followed by the assessee being percentage completion method, that there was […]
Scope of Section 254(2) to rectify mistake apparent from record is very limited and tribunal cannot review its own decisions within limited scope of Section 254(2) unless there is a mistake apparent from records neither it is shown that tribunal order is perverse not sustainable in the eyes of law.
Section 54F do not prescribe any condition as to the date of commencement of construction of new house property, meaning thereby that the construction of house property may be commenced even before the date of transfer of original asset.
