It cannot be a universal rule that once an appeal from the order of the Tribunal has been admitted in the quantum proceedings by High Court, then, ipso facto the issue is a debatable issue warranting deletion of penalty by the Tribunal.
Reopening of assessment of A.Y. 2005-06 after expiry of four years without obtaining approval of an officer of the rank of Joint Commissioner was bad in law and even if such approval had been granted, by the officer superior i.e., the DIT, it would not cure the defect.
The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the assessee against final assessment order dated 27.9.2017 passed u/s 143(3) read with section 144C(5) in pursuance of directions given by the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) vide order dated 7.9.2017.
Meat of Sheep or goat or poultry, frozen and packed in LDPE/HDPE bags having varied weight and quantity printed/labelled on such pickings, whether could be held to be packed in unit containers?
In re Esprit India Private Limited (GST AAR Haryana) i. Taxability of services provided by Esprit India to its associate concern in Hong Kong EDCFE under GST regime. The services provided by Esprit India to its associate concern in Hong Kong EDCFE are taxable supplies, as discussed in para 6 above ii. Whether the services […]
In case the customer does not or is not able to redeem the rewards points, within their validity period of 36 months from the date of issue, the reward points are forfeited by the applicant. Whether this amount of issuance fee retained/forfeited by LSRPL, would amount to consideration for actionable claims and subject to GST.
R.S. Infra-Transmission Ltd Vs State of Rajasthan (Rajasthan High Court) The contention of Mr. R.B. Mathur is that Rule 18 will take care of the situation. However, while considering the matter, we have to look into the matter whether the benefit envisaged under the Rajasthan VAT Act especially under sub-Section (1) shall be allowed only […]
For the only reason that the payment of purchase has been made after a lapse of 9 months cannot render the purchase as non genuine unless and otherwise any material is brought on record which could negate this
The appellant is aggrieved by the order dated 16/08/2017 of Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise, New Delhi. The appellant is managing hotels and restaurants. They were providing rooms for rent and also various food items, cakes, pastries, cookies, confectionary to the customers in their restaurants.
Reasons recorded by AO to reopen assessment merely on basis of information from DIT(Inv.) without independently applying his own mind could not be said to be reason to believe that income had escaped assessment hence, reopening was bad in law.
