Bhawish Chand Sharma Vs Bawa Singh (Delhi High Court) The mutual agreement between the parties to disclose only a part of the consideration under the sale deed may attract other consequences for the parties. However, that by itself does not render the underlying transaction unlawful. Pertinently, it is not claimed that at the relevant time, […]
The High Court has read the relevant clauses of the lease deed and has rightly come to the conclusion that payment which is to be made as annual rent is rent within the meaning of Section 194I, we do not find any infirmity in the aforesaid conclusion of the High Court. The High Court has rightly held that TDS shall be deducted on the payment of the lease rent to the Greater Noida as per Section 194I.
Kalpana Chimanlal Shah Vs ITO (Gujarat High Court) The Assessing Officer examined the petitioner’s declaration of sale of immovable property and resultant loss, which she claimed. The Assessing Officer called for the purchase and sale deeds as also supporting evidence for computation of capital gain. The assessee produced such documents and the approved valuer’s report assessing […]
ITO Vs Meera Thapa (ITAT Delhi) Assessee has sold agricultural land as it has been proved by the certificate of Tehsildar and other land records. He further held that merely because the land is declared as industrial land same cannot be held to be a capital asset and capital gain cannot be charged on sale […]
Mumbai ITAT Ruling – Section 92 of the Act is not an independent charging section to bring in a new head of income or to charge tax on income which is otherwise not chargeable under the Act. Accordingly, the ITAT held that, if no income accrues or arises or is received by the assessee under […]
CIT Vs Shiv Agrevo Ltd. (Rajasthan High Court) The prevailing market rates of interest for the loans of permanent nature were between 18 per cent, to 24 per cent, whereas the cases compared by AO pertained to the loans of temporary nature and that the assessee had advanced money for the purpose of business needs. […]
The submission of Sri Vishwjit, learned counsel for the petitioners is that the seizure is on account of non filing Part-B of E-way Bill. Part-B of E-Way Bill requires the details of the vehicle carrying the goods and the destination.
In re Raghav Productivity Enhancers Limited (GST AAR Rajasthan) Ramming Mass which is a Refractory Material, is classifiable under HSN code 3816 and would attract 18% rate of tax under GST (9% CGST + 9% SGST). Quartz powder obtained by crushing Quartz stones falls under HSN code 2806 and would attract 5% rate of tax […]
Hon’ble SC held that Though NOIDA is not a local authority, it is a corporation established by Act and so payments to it are not liable to TDS U/s.194A of Income Tax Act, 1961.
Gujarat HC dismisses petition by Apollo Screens Pvt Ltd. to carry forward CENVAT Credit, citing lack of evidence for technical filing errors.
