n the present petition, the petitioners who are themselves active tax consultants and tax practitioners have challenged the vires of section 47 of CGST Act. They are obviously indirectly concerned with the same. As noted, they pointed out that there are millions of dealers who would be adversely affected by the provisions made therein.
DCIT Vs Ramesh Madhavrao Bhujang (ITAT Mumbai) It is undisputed fact that the assessee had acquired the right in the property pursuant to allotment letter dated 10/03/2008, a copy of which has been placed on page number-111 of the paper-book. The assessee has made the full payment of Rs.83.30 Lacs by 25/06/2008. The said fact […]
W#e are of the view that the transfer of T&D Division of the assessee-company was not in a manner prescribed in section 2(19AA) so as to treat the same as demerger for the purpose of Income Tax Act and the benefit of section 47(viia) was not available to the assessee-company as rightly held by the Assessing Officer.
Pr. CIT Vs Prakashkumar Bhagchandbhai Khatri (Gujarat High Court) Where assessee, in terms of agreement with company for development and consideration of land owned by assessee, had received trade advances, the same were not loans, therefore, section 2(22)(e) was not attracted. The Tribunal while confirming the view of CIT(A) opined that amount in question was […]
CJ International Hotels Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Tips for hotel employees included and paid by customers and collected by the employer and disbursed to the employees do not amount to salary or profit in lieu of salary or payment made by or on behalf of the employer, as such provisions requiring deduction of tax […]
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income tax(Appeals) dated 01/05/2014 and pertains to assessment year 2010-11.The Grounds of appeal read as under :- Being aggrieved by the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-25, Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as Learned CIT (A)) dated 01.05.2014 under section 250 of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (herein after referred as ‘IT Act’), the appellant submits this appeal on the following grounds each of which may please be considered without prejudice to one another
CLC & Sons Pvt. Ltd Vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi) (Special Bench) Hon’ble Summit court in CIT vs. Smifs Securities Ltd. (2012) 348 ITR 302 (SC) in which it has been held: “that goodwill will fall under the expression ‘or any other business or commercial rights of similar nature’” and, hence, qualifies for depreciation u/s 32(1) of […]
M/s. Oriental Insurance co. ltd, Vs JCIT (ITAT Delhi) In the present case the quarterly TDS return in form No. 24Q, which was to be filed by the assessee on 15.06.2011 was filed on 05.04.2013 causing the delay of 660 days. The main reason shown by the assessee is that the work was entrusted to […]
Without adjudicating the said issue, the second respondent cannot proceed to recover the amount, that too, by issuing a notice against a dead person. Hence, the impugned notice is held to be not sustainable in law.
This appeal by the Revenue is preferred against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax [Appeals] – 40, New Delhi dated 31.12.2015 pertaining to A.Y 2011-12. 2. Grievances of the Revenue read as und
