whether the rejection of petitioner’s application under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Form No. SVLDRS-3 in respect of central excise duty payable is justified by law?
In re Hazari Bagh Builders Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Rajasthan) The Applicant Company is registered in the State of Rajasthan and having GSTIN in State of Rajasthan. The Applicant company has entered into a long term Lease Agreement of 99 years with RLDA for undertaking residential & commercial development along with development of financial infrastructure […]
The issue under consideration is whether the contention of the petitioner that the provisional attachment for wrong availment of ITC is without jurisdiction and illegal is correct?
SC directs ICAI on exam opt-outs. Only 52,000 out of 3,46,000 students opt out. Adjournment for ICAI’s draft on concerns. Next hearing on July 2.
Stay against Penalty order under IBC allowed against petitioner who has violated Terms of Moratorium
Merely because a prescribed Form No. 3CEB was filed in accordance with Rule 10E r.w.s. 92BA of the Act would not make an assessee susceptible to onerous investigation proceedings on such transactions where the assessee prima facie demonstrates that Section 92BA of the Act is wholly inapplicable in any manner at the first instance
Commercial Tax Officer & Anr. Vs Mohan Brewaries and Distrilleries Ltd. (Supreme Court) Appeal filed by the revenue (Civil Appeal No. 7164 of 2013) is partly allowed by holding that the purchase turnover of the empty bottles purchased by the assessee from the unregistered dealers under bought note is exigible to purchase tax under Section […]
In re North Shore Technologies Private Limited (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) Question 1- Whether the subsidized shared transport facility provided to employees in terms of employment contract through third party vendors, would be construed as “Supply of service” by the company to its employees? Ans: Answered in negative. Question 2- If the answer to above […]
A.Y. Garment International Private Ltd. Vs DCIT (Karnatka High Court) Whether the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the amendment made by Finance Act, 2010 in the provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is not retrospective in operation on the facts and circumstances of the case? The issue whether the […]
In re Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad (GST AAAR Uttar Pradesh) Now coming to the value of taxable supply in case of advance payment, we observe that explanation given in the sub Section 2 of Section 13 of the CGST Act, 2017 provides that-: “Explanation- For the purpose of clause (a) and (b)- (i) […]
