Follow Us:

Judiciary

Revised minimum threshold limit of tax effect also applies to pending appeals 

May 28, 2020 22014 Views 0 comment Print

Revised enhanced minimum threshold limit of tax effect of Rs. 50,00,000 vide recent CBDT Circular No. 17/2-19, dt. 8-8-2019 was applicable not only for appeals to be filed by revenue in future; but also for appeals already filed by revenue in ITAT. Accordingly, all existing appeals in ITAT, having tax effect below revised/enhanced limit of Rs. 50,00,000, had to be treated as withdrawn/not pressed, and therefore, not maintainable.

HC explains provisions of Section 45(1) of PMLA, 2002 – Offences to be cognizable & non- bailable

May 28, 2020 5934 Views 0 comment Print

Ahilya Devi Wife of Late Birendar Yadav Vs State of Bihar (Patna High Court) It is eminent that clause (ii) of sub-Section (1) of Section 45 of the Act places two conditions for release of a person accused of an offence under the Act, on bail, if a Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application, namely; […]

‘Works Contract’ for fitting out any movable property into patient’s body in course of medical procedure was liable for VAT

May 28, 2020 2574 Views 0 comment Print

Works contract for fitting out or implanting of prosthetics into the physiology or the body of the patient for alleviation of pain or for improvement of the life of the patient in the course of medical/surgical procedure could be construed as ‘works contract’  liable for VAT under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax  Act, 2006.

Appeal can be filed before High Court against an order of acquittal passed by a Magistrate on complaint

May 28, 2020 75507 Views 0 comment Print

As against an order of acquittal passed by a Magistrate on a complaint, an appeal will lie only before the High Court, under Section 378 (4) of Cr.PC. In such cases, the complainant has to seek for Special leave under Section 378 (5) of Cr.PC.Since the decision rendered in S. Ganapathy V. N. Senthilvel ((2016) 4 CTC 119) was per- incuriam, the consequence of this judgement which had resulted in orders being passed and which had become final / acted upon by the parties, could never be allowed to be re-opened. 

Assessment without Section 143(2) notice is not justified in law 

May 27, 2020 2772 Views 0 comment Print

The issue under consideration is whether CIT(A) is correct by annulling the assessment order on the ground that no notice under section 143(2) was issued before the completion of assessment?

Assessee eligible for TDS deducted on Income collected on behalf of Govt.

May 27, 2020 1299 Views 0 comment Print

The issue under consideration is whether A.O. is correct in denial of credit of TDS on rental income collected by the appellant under an agreement on behalf of Government?

Hostel Facility by Charitable Educational Trust cannot be held as business

May 27, 2020 4917 Views 0 comment Print

Harish Chand Ram Kali Charitable Trust Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) The issue under consideration is whether the CIT(A) is correct in concluding that the hostel running activity is a business activity? The assessee society was established with the aim to impart education and other charitable activities covered under section 2(15) of The Income Tax Act. […]

Retention money taxable in year of contract condition fulfillment

May 27, 2020 15510 Views 0 comment Print

Right to receive the retention money is accrued only after the obligations under the contract are fulfilled and the assessee had no vested right to receive the same in this assessment year, therefore, it would not amount to an income of the assessee in the year in which it is retained.

No Profiteering if no reduction in Tax tax or increase in ITC benefit

May 27, 2020 789 Views 0 comment Print

Shri Kapil Dev Sharma Vs Director General of Anti-Profiteering (NAA) The DGAP has further reported that Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 came into play in the event where there was a reduction in the rate of tax or there was an increase in the benefit of ITC. In the present case, since the […]

Higher discount justified if Goods imports in Bulk & maintain inventory by incurring Additional Cost

May 27, 2020 5970 Views 0 comment Print

Lutron GL Sales & Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi) The issue under consideration is whether the percentage of enhancement to the transaction value ordered by the Deputy Commissioner of Customs is justified in law? In the present case, the appellant M/s Lutron GL Sales & Services Pvt. Limited imports lighting control […]

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031