Follow Us:

Judiciary

QIAshredder Not a Standalone Filter, Classified as Part Under CTH 84219900: CAAR

January 20, 2026 294 Views 0 comment Print

Advance ruling held QIAshredder cannot function independently and works only with a centrifuge. It was classified as parts under CTH 84219900, not 84212900.

Section 271(1)(c) Penalty Set Aside for Vague Limb in Notice: ITAT Delhi

January 20, 2026 1005 Views 0 comment Print

The penalty was quashed as the Assessing Officer failed to strike off the inapplicable limb in the notice. Clear satisfaction and precise charge are mandatory for sustaining penalty proceedings.

Cheque Tampering Not a Defence: Material Alteration Still Attracts Section 138; J&K&L HC

January 20, 2026 1101 Views 0 comment Print

While alteration of the cheque amount is a material alteration under law, the court ruled that consent and responsibility for alteration are factual questions. The complaint was not quashed at the pre-trial stage.

Notional Rent Deleted for Unsold Villas Held During Pandemic: ITAT Bangalore

January 20, 2026 195 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal held that land cost must be allocated based on saleable/built-up area under the JDA, not total land area. It directed adoption of a higher per-sq-ft land cost while recomputing capital gains.

Section 153A Invalid Where No Incriminating Material Found in Search: ITAT Delhi

January 20, 2026 411 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal held that assessments under Section 153A cannot be sustained when no incriminating material is found at the assessees premises. Additions based on third-party material were quashed as being without jurisdiction.

Belated Return Under Section 148 Still Requires 143(2) Notice: ITAT Delhi

January 20, 2026 1113 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal ruled that treating a belated return as non est is legally unsustainable. Absence of a Section 143(2) notice invalidates the entire reassessment proceedings.

Contribution to State Nodal Agency Allowed as Application of Income

January 20, 2026 168 Views 0 comment Print

Payments to AwasBandhu were allowed as application of income. The Tribunal held such statutory contributions further public purposes and cannot be treated as non-business or taxable expenses.

Cash Advances Not Taxable Before Project Completion Under PCM

January 20, 2026 282 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal held that cash advances/on-money received for an ongoing real estate project cannot be taxed before completion when the Project Completion Method is consistently followed. Income already offered and accepted in the completion year cannot be taxed again earlier.

GSTAT Closed Case as No Profiteering Found Under Anti-Profiteering Law

January 20, 2026 387 Views 0 comment Print

The GST Appellate Tribunal accepted the DGAP report after finding no profiteering under Section 171 of the CGST Act. With no appearance from the complainant, the proceedings were concluded and the case was disposed of.

GSTAT Directed Builder to Refund Net Profiteering With Interest to Home Buyers

January 20, 2026 303 Views 0 comment Print

The GST Appellate Tribunal held that the profiteering amount must exclude benefits already passed on to home buyers. The respondent was directed to refund the net amount with interest to eligible buyers within three months.

Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031