Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Solitairian Buildinfra Private Limited Vs DCIT/ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Solitairian Buildinfra Private Limited Vs DCIT/ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Quashed – Defective Notice Without Specifying Limb Held Fatal The Delhi ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal and quashed the penalty of ₹5.45 lakh levied under Section 271(1)(c) on the ground that the penalty notice was defective and invalid in law. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had issued the notice under Section 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) by mentioning both limbs – “concealment of income” and “furnishing of inaccurate particulars” – without striking off the inapplicable...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930