CESTAT Chennai rejection of refund claim merely for non-mentioning of period particulars in CA’s certificate unjustifiable as rejection of claim on this basis would be harsh.
Delhi High Court held that reassessment action under section 148 of the Income Tax Act post approval of the resolution plan unsustainable as validity of resolution plan not questioned at any stage.
Gauhati High Court held that notification no.56/2023-CE dated 28.12.2023 is not in consonance with the provisions of 168(A) of the Central GST Act, 2017. Hence, all consequential actions so taken on the basis of such notification would also fail.
ITAT Mumbai held that disallowance made by the CPC u/s. 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act on the claim of deduction u/s. 80P of the Income Tax Act is beyond the scope of adjustment u/s. 143(1) accordingly the adjustment is deleted.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition u/s. 68 on account of unexplained cash credit, being bogus unsecured loan, and u/s. 69C on account of unexplained expenditure, being bogus interest claimed, unjustified as repayment of loans in subsequent year accepted.
ITAT Bangalore held that imposition of penalty under section 271D of the Income Tax Act unwarranted as reasonable cause shown for accepting the cash on account of sale of immovable property.
It is Petitioner’s case that a show cause notice dated 7th December 2023 without any details was issued calling upon Petitioner to attend the office of Respondent No.2. Respondent No.2 proceeded to pass the impugned order dated 28th March 2024 u/s. 23 of the MVAT Act.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that contribution under National Pension System (NPS) belatedly, however, before filing of return is allowable as deduction u/s. 43B(b) of the Income Tax Act as there is no due date prescribed for payment under NPS.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that passing of revisionary order by PCIT u/s. 263 of the Income Tax Act without giving proper and adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee is liable to be set aside.
Allahabad HC upholds tax and penalty on Anil Rice Mill for wrong ITC claims under GST, emphasizing the burden of proof lies on the purchaser.
