Rejection of refund claim for non-mentioning of period particulars in CA’s certificate is harsh: CESTAT Chennai

Jumar Trade Links Vs Commissioner of Customs (Exports) (CESTAT Chennai)

CESTAT Chennai rejection of refund claim merely for non-mentioning of period particulars in CA’s certificate unjustifiable as rejection of claim on this basis would be harsh.

Facts- Appellant filed a refund claim of Rs.2,28,822/- being the amount paid against 4% Additional Duty of Customs (ADC) for the import of Galvanized Steel Coils/Strips vide 5 Bills of Entry. The appellant claimed refund in terms of Notification No. 102/2007-Cus dated 14.9.2007 as amended and subm

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.