Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jumar Trade Links Vs Commissioner of Customs (Exports) (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Jumar Trade Links Vs Commissioner of Customs (Exports) (CESTAT Chennai)

CESTAT Chennai rejection of refund claim merely for non-mentioning of period particulars in CA’s certificate unjustifiable as rejection of claim on this basis would be harsh.

Facts- Appellant filed a refund claim of Rs.2,28,822/- being the amount paid against 4% Additional Duty of Customs (ADC) for the import of Galvanized Steel Coils/Strips vide 5 Bills of Entry. The appellant claimed refund in terms of Notification No. 102/2007-Cus dated 14.9.2007 as amended and subm

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31