Delhi HC rules GST cancellation order invalid for retrospective effect. Prospective from SCN date. Order passed without proper hearing violates natural justice.
Karnataka High Court dismisses Tayana Consult Pvt Ltd’s appeal due to non-prosecution, following ITAT’s decision in related tax assessments.
ITAT held that disallowances based on estimations do not constitute underreporting of income and thus are not grounds for a penalty under Section 270A.
ITAT Ahmedabad rules that Section 50C applies to sellers, not buyers, and clarifies the retrospective effect of Section 56(2)(vii)(b) on property transactions.
ITAT Kolkata quashes DCIT’s reassessment of Ganesh Steel for AY 2012-13 due to jurisdictional errors and invalid addition of bogus purchases under Section 69C.
ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of Jitendra Vanigota, deleting the ₹595,000 addition under Section 56(2)(x) for AY 2020-21. Learn more about the case details and judgment.
GST authorities could not invoke penal provisions under the Indian Penal Code ( IPC ) without applying the corresponding penal provisions under the GST Act, 2017 especially when the allegations of issuing fake invoices to avail input tax credit ( ITC ) fraudulently fall under the scope of the GST Act.
Proper officer under Customs Act could detain the goods or stall the process of importation, without forming a requisite opinion in support of a suspicion that he had regarding the issue of Country-Of-Origin (COO) certificate or the origin of the imported articles.
Reclassification of AC remote components made by assessee was accepted as specific Chapter Notes and Section Notes were to be preferred over General Interpretative Rules while classifying product.
Delhi High Court held that section 45(3) of the Customs Act provides that the custodian of the imported goods having been in custody is liable to pay duty in case they are pilfered while in custody. Accordingly, customs duty and penalty rightly levied.
