Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Narayanan Sundaramahalingam Rajkumar Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Narayanan Sundaramahalingam Rajkumar Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai)

In the case of Narayanan Sundaramahalingam Rajkumar vs. ACIT, the Chennai Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dealt with a penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 270A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The case stemmed from an assessment for the year 2018-19, where the AO disallowed 30% of the indexed cost of development expenses related to the sale of land by the assessee. The disallowance amounted to ₹16,63,384, and a penalty of ₹7,88,112 was levied, citing underreporting of income due to failure to f

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

A Blogger by Passion and a Chartered Accountant by Profession. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Pune Allows Foreign Tax Credit despite Late Filing of Form 67 Gujarat HC Allows Condonation of delay in filing Form 10B for Charitable Trust Delhi HC Upholds FEMA Penalty on OCI Cardholder ITAT Upholds PCIT Order: LIC Annuity as Taxable Salary GST Appeal Limitation: Three months follows British calendar, not 90 days – Kerala HC View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31