Asha Viren Raj Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) The Asha Viren Raj Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) case revolves around the contentious issue of reassessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the taxation of commodity transaction income. The original assessment for Assessment Year (AY) 2012-13 was completed under Section 143(3). However, the Income […]
Andhra Pradesh High Court held that notification no. 9 of 2022, Central Tax (Rate) is effective only from 18.07.2022 and hence refund on account of inverted duty structure is admissible for period prior to 18.07.2022 and restricted for period after 18.07.2022.
Gauhati High Court held that addition merely on the basis of retracted statement without any other relied upon evidence/ material is not sustainable since retracted statement cannot be termed as incriminating material. Hence, appeal of revenue dismissed.
Calcutta High Court held that GSTR-9 returns should also be considered in case the Input Tax Credit (ITC) not reflected in GSTR-3B. Accordingly, matter restored for re-adjudication by considering GSTR-9 return.
ITAT Jaipur quashes addition of suppressed school fees for Pushpa Vidya Niketan, stating survey statements lack evidentiary value without corroboration.
ITAT Mumbai rules that the 10% tolerance limit under Section 50C/56(2)(x) is curative and applies retrospectively, impacting property valuation disputes.
ITAT Bangalore upheld CIT(A)’s acceptance of additional evidence in local language, dismissing AO’s addition under Section 69A. Read the case details here.
ITAT Bangalore set aside penalty orders under Section 271B due to improper notice delivery to an unrelated email ID and failure to provide adequate response time.
ITAT Bangalore rules in favor of Udaya Ravi Arecanut Co., stating that tax retention without legal backing is unjust. Case remitted for fresh adjudication.
ITAT Mumbai quashes reassessment order in Raghunandan Bhomia vs DCIT case, citing failure to provide reasons for reopening assessment, violating legal precedents.
