Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Subscription Books Submit Post
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax High-Turnover Comparables Excluded From ALP: Bangalore ITAT Grants Partial Relief Income Tax Bangalore ITAT Excludes Functionally Dissimilar Comparables in Transfer Pricing Case Income Tax ITAT Bangalore Applies Rs.200 Crore Turnover Filter to Software Comparables Income Tax ITAT Pune Excludes Three Comparables, Treats Forex Gain as Operating Revenue in Transperfect Solutions Case Income Tax ITAT Pune Excludes Four Comparables in Transfer Pricing Case; e4e Healthcare Issue Remanded Income Tax ITAT Pune Excludes Bhilwara Infotechnology, Aspire Systems & MPS as Comparables for AY 2016-17 Service Tax CESTAT Kolkata Allows CENVAT Credit on Cement Plant Setup Services, Sets Aside ₹57.68 Lakh Demand Excise Duty CESTAT Allows CENVAT Credit on Input Services Used for Factory Modernisation Post-2011
Goods and Services Tax

Digital or manual signature of officer must for treating order u/s. 73 of CGST Act as valid

By POONAM GANDHI Goods and Services Tax Judiciary December 27, 2024
Share:

Case Law Details

Case Name
Fortune Service Vs Union of India (Kerala High Court)
Appeal Number
Only available for paid members
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Courts
All High Courts, Kerala High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.

Already Upgraded? Log in.

Advertisement Fortune Service Vs Union of India (Kerala High Court) Kerala High Court held that orders issued u/s. 73 of the CGST/SGST Acts must carry the digital or manual signature of the officer passing the order in order to treat the order to be a valid order for the purposes of the CGST/SGST Acts. Accordingly, writ allowed and order quashed. Facts- The short question arising in these writ petitions is whether orders issued under Section 73 of the CGST/SGST Acts must carry the digital or manual signature of the officer passing the order in order to treat the order to be a valid order fo...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement
Filed under

Author Info

POONAM GANDHI
Name: POONAM GANDHI
Qualification: CA in Practice
Location: AHMEDABAD, Gujarat
Articles Published: 9,037
View full profile →
More from POONAM GANDHI

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Related Articles in Goods and Services Tax
Telangana HC Allows Fresh GST Revocation Application Due to Lack of Notice Knowledge

Telangana HC Allows Fresh GST Revocation Application Due to Lack of Notice Knowledge

August 17, 2026
Telangana HC Allows Appeal Against GST Order Due to Taxpayer’s Lack of Knowledge of Proceedings

Telangana HC Allows Appeal Against GST Order Due to Taxpayer’s Lack of Knowledge of Proceedings

August 17, 2026
Telangana HC Permits Appeal Against Unsigned GST Order Passed Under Section 73

Telangana HC Permits Appeal Against Unsigned GST Order Passed Under Section 73

August 17, 2026
Law And Procedure For Pre-Deposit For Tribunal Appeals In GST

Law And Procedure For Pre-Deposit For Tribunal Appeals In GST

August 17, 2026
Penalty Not Leviable under section 129 CGST Act Where No Tax Payable

Penalty Not Leviable under section 129 CGST Act Where No Tax Payable

August 17, 2026
Gujarat HC Upholds GST Penalty on Partners for Fake Invoicing & Hawala Transactions

Gujarat HC Upholds GST Penalty on Partners for Fake Invoicing & Hawala Transactions

August 17, 2026
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *