TAT Delhi Remands Rs 82 Cr 153C Additions, Terms CIT(A) Order Mechanical; Rubber-Stamping Not Allowed: ITAT Delhi Quashes Non-Speaking CIT(A) Order in 153C Case
ITAT Bangalore ruled that an AO cannot re-initiate assessment after a PCIT ‘sets aside’ an order without providing fresh directions, quashing a cash deposit addition.
No recovery of outstanding GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) demand could be made once a taxpayer deposited the statutory pre-deposit under Section 112(8) of the CGST Act and filed an undertaking to approach the Appellate Tribunal when it become functional.
Bombay High Court held that secured creditors have a clear priority over the dues of the State as per Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act. Thus, clear title must pass to auction purchaser and State cannot be allowed to continue its encumbrance upon secured asset sold.
NCLT Delhi held that CIRP application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code dismissed as the applicant is primarily seeking to recover its dues, rather than facilitating the resolution of the Corporate Debtor, who is solvent and operational.
Karnataka High Court held that the assessment order passed is beyond the time limit prescribed under Section 144C(13) of Income Tax Act. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of.
CESTAT Delhi held that import of essential components constituting an E-Rickshaw in CKD [Complete Knock Down] or SKD [Semi- Knock Down] is rightly classifiable under CTH 8703 9000. Accordingly, order upheld and appeal is dismissed.
Allahabad High Court voids a GST registration cancellation, citing a contradictory order that revealed non-application of mind and a lack of due process.
Allahabad High Court sets aside a GST registration cancellation, citing violations of natural justice, including improper notice and lack of a hearing.
ITAT Delhi rules on TDS default. If the payee pays tax, the deductor isn’t in default, preventing disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) but not interest.
