ITAT Surat held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act deleted since appellant has satisfactorily explained the nature and source of the credit. Accordingly, appeal allowed and addition deleted.
The bills so assigned to the Financial Creditors and the amounts against such bills was disbursed. In the process of transactions, the Applicants stated to have paid a sum of Rs. 2,34,17,965/- on various dates.
ITAT Delhi held that the interest on compensation or on enhanced compensation cannot be considered as compensation and shall be chargeable to tax under the head income from other sources. Accordingly, appeal dismissed.
A Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was initiated by the adjudicating authority (NCLT) in respect of RITL-Corporate Debtor at the instance of Ericsson India Private Limited, and the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) was appointed.
On 21.04.2017, a Share Purchase Agreement was executed, wherein the erstwhile Directors sold their equity in favour of Accord Mediplus Pvt. Ltd. Respondent Nos.6 to 12 also resigned from the Trust on 01.09.2017.
ITAT Mumbai held that reopening of assessment under section 148 of the Income Tax Act beyond 3 years liable to be quashed as escaped income is less than INR 50,00,000. Thus, notice issued u/s. 148 quashed.
In the opinion of this Court, there existed no reason for the non-adjudication of the show-cause notice and therefore this Court is of the opinion that the facts do not reveal any glaring impossibility for the Customs Department to deal with the show-cause notice.
Search action was carried out on residential premises of assessee. Several incriminating documents were found and seized. Assessee was issued with notice to file Income Tax Return and seeking details for seven assessment years within 5 days.
The alleged misdeclaration in the year of manufacture of the machinery to be imported by the appellant to the Directorate General of Foreign Trade ( DGFT ) did not fall within the purview of Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962.
Kerala High Court held that services of looking after socio-economic and welfare matters of ex-serviceman by the charitable society is leviable to service tax. Accordingly, appeal dismissed the service tax leviable on the same.
