The ITAT Delhi has ruled that no penalty can be sustained on estimated income, deleting the penalty levied on an individual for discrepancies found in his Form 26AS.
ITAT Delhi quashes an assessment order for the Shilpi Sardana case, ruling that the Section 143(2) notice was invalid as it did not conform to the CBDT’s mandated format.
The ITAT Delhi has quashed the reassessment against Sonia Kapoor, ruling it invalid. The court found that because no addition was made on the initial reason for reopening, the entire process was void.
The ITAT Delhi has upheld the deletion of a ₹3.51 crore addition, ruling that the assessee proved the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of unsecured loans.
ITAT Delhi upholds the deletion of a ₹1.39 crore tax addition against Vikas Associates, ruling that the assessment was invalid under Section 153C based on the Delhi High Court’s Ojjus Medicare judgment.
The ITAT Delhi allows a taxpayer to claim a Section 80C deduction even though it was initially omitted from their tax return, citing a lack of a bar in the law for that year.
The ITAT Ahmedabad dismissed the tax department’s appeal, ruling that cash withdrawals of ₹8.89 crore were not unexplained. The tribunal upheld the assessee’s claim that the cash was used for business payments, as the tax officer had accepted the corresponding sales.
ITAT Patna upholds the deletion of a ₹4.98 crore addition, ruling that purchases are not bogus just because suppliers failed to file returns or respond to tax notices.
ITAT Pune sends a tax case back to the CIT(A), stressing that an assessment on a deceased person is legally invalid. The Tribunal ruled the CIT(A) must first decide on this jurisdictional issue.
The ITAT Cuttack ruled that additions cannot be made for completed assessments without incriminating material found during a search, upholding the principle from the Abhisar Buildwell case.
