Assessee, being a charitable trust registered under Section 12A, was entitled to exemption under Sections 10(34) and 10(35) for dividend and mutual fund income therefore, denial of exemption by invoking Sections 13(1)(d) and 13(2)(h) was unjustified
Since issuance of multiple show cause notices and orders for the same tax period under the TGST/CGST Acts was contrary to law and administrative propriety. therefore, in light of the State’s assurance and Circular No. LIV(2)/33/2025 dated 14.10.2025 introducing a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for rectification under Section 161 of the TGST Act
The Court directed the customs authority to complete the remanded adjudication within four weeks after prolonged inaction following a previous remand order.
The Madras High Court directed reassessment of GST interest, holding that tax already paid before notice issuance must be considered while computing interest under Section 39.
ITAT Delhi remitted a case where CIT(A) upheld additions without examining available evidence. The ruling reinforces that authorities must fully consider documents and explanations before confirming unexplained investments.
The ITAT Mumbai remanded a ₹50 lakh addition case after finding that a business loan was omitted from audited accounts and required further verification.
ITAT Kolkata held that gifts received from a brother-in-law are exempt under Section 56(2)(vii), as the relationship qualifies as relative for tax purposes.
The Court directed reconsideration of a GST demand after finding that the taxpayer’s reply was not fully evaluated in confirming an ITC discrepancy.
High Court held that DGGI summons were unenforceable after jurisdiction to investigate was confirmed to rest with the State Tax Department, resolving the petitioner’s grievance.
Allahabad High Court set aside a GST cancellation order for being non-speaking, without application of mind and without giving the taxpayer an opportunity of hearing, holding it violated Article 14.
