The Cochin ITAT has set aside a Rs.35.05 crore income addition to Keezhuparamba Service Co-operative Bank. The court remanded the matter for fresh verification, noting that the Assessing Officer mistakenly clubbed members’ deposits with share capital.
The Cochin ITAT has set aside an addition under Section 68, ruling that a taxpayer’s claim of transferring funds from a housing loan to a capital account requires further verification. The court remanded the matter back to the Assessing Officer.
ITAT Raipur, in case of Manish Kumar Jain vs. ITO, ruled that Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) cannot summarily dismiss an appeal based solely on a delay.
Gujarat High Court held that the proceedings under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act cannot be initiated to review the earlier stand adopted by the Assessing Officer. Accordingly, initiation of reassessment proceedings u/s. 148A(d) on the same ground which is already considered by AO cannot be sustained.
The ITAT Pune ruled in the case of Nanasaheb Bhagawan Sasar vs. ITO that an assessee is entitled to a full Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) credit, even if the buyer mistakenly deducted the entire amount in the assessee’s name for a joint property sale.
Rajkot Bench of ITAT granted relief to a farmer by deleting an addition for unexplained investment, holding that land purchase was funded by compensation from Reliance Infrastructure.
Delhi High Court stops GST authorities from recovering a refund from Ikiraon Technologies Pvt. Ltd. The court’s order protects the company until the GST Appellate Tribunal is operational.
NCLAT Delhi held that claim of wages and salaries after the issuance of the layoff notice rightly rejected since the appellant workmen due to issuance of the layoff notice has not worked after issuance of this layoff notice. Accordingly, appeal dismissed.
NCLAT Delhi Held that a written agreement is not a condition precedent to prove the existence of a financial debt. Accordingly, CIRP application u/s. 7 of IBC duly admitted as debt and default proved.
Both return and Form 10B were filed within extended due date (31.10.2018). Thus, substantive compliance was achieved. Filing of audit report after the return but before expiry of due date could not be construed as fatal non-compliance.
