The ITAT Pune ruled in the case of Nanasaheb Bhagawan Sasar vs. ITO that an assessee is entitled to a full Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) credit, even if the buyer mistakenly deducted the entire amount in the assessee’s name for a joint property sale.
Rajkot Bench of ITAT granted relief to a farmer by deleting an addition for unexplained investment, holding that land purchase was funded by compensation from Reliance Infrastructure.
Delhi High Court stops GST authorities from recovering a refund from Ikiraon Technologies Pvt. Ltd. The court’s order protects the company until the GST Appellate Tribunal is operational.
NCLAT Delhi held that claim of wages and salaries after the issuance of the layoff notice rightly rejected since the appellant workmen due to issuance of the layoff notice has not worked after issuance of this layoff notice. Accordingly, appeal dismissed.
NCLAT Delhi Held that a written agreement is not a condition precedent to prove the existence of a financial debt. Accordingly, CIRP application u/s. 7 of IBC duly admitted as debt and default proved.
Both return and Form 10B were filed within extended due date (31.10.2018). Thus, substantive compliance was achieved. Filing of audit report after the return but before expiry of due date could not be construed as fatal non-compliance.
Where the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) accepted international transactions at arm’s length without proposing any variation under Section 92CA(3), assessee did not qualify as an “eligible assessee” under Section 144C(15)(b).
Since the SCN did not propose retrospective cancellation or raise the issue of non-existent premises, the impugned cancellation order was unsustainable therefore, assessee’s GST registration should be treated as cancelled only from 31 December 2024, the date of the SCN.
ITAT Pune has sent the case of Shankar Saybu Rakhewar back to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for a new hearing.
Mumbai ITAT has restored a bogus purchases case to the Assessing Officer for a fresh hearing, ruling that CIT(A) erred by partially restricting the addition without giving the assessee a full opportunity to present evidence.
