Corporate Law : Calls for a High Court Bench in West UP remain ignored. SC urged to intervene in judicial disparities affecting millions. Know the...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court quashes rape case, stating consensual relationship, even with breach of promise, doesn't automatically constitute ra...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court emphasizes strict scrutiny of FIRs under stringent laws like the UP Gangsters Act to prevent misuse in property ...
Custom Duty : The Supreme Court rules DRI officers as proper officers for customs under Section 28, overturning past judgments and reshaping tax...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court rules that failure to inform grounds of arrest violates Article 22(1), making the arrest illegal and warranting bail...
Corporate Law : Key IBC case law updates from Oct-Dec 2024, covering Supreme Court and High Court decisions on CoC powers, resolution plans, relat...
Income Tax : Government addresses Supreme Court judgment on tax exemptions for clergy and its implications on Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs) u...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court rejects regularisation of illegal constructions, irrespective of occupancy or investments, and calls for action agai...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court Collegium recommends three advocates—Ajay Digpaul, Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, and Shwetasree Majumder—for ...
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court clarified procedures for summons, warrants, and bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), emphasizin...
Income Tax : Supreme Court emphasizes reasonable cause for TDS non-deduction under Section 271C. Highlights interplay of Sections 4, 5, 9, and ...
Income Tax : Supreme Court reaffirms that charitable trust registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act should be based on proposed ac...
Corporate Law : Smt. Syeda Rahimunnisa and Syed Hyder Hussaini are wife and husband whereas the respondent no. 1(a) to 1(f) are the legal heirs of...
Income Tax : The Supreme Court dismissed Madhumilan Syntex Ltd.'s appeal against prosecution for delayed TDS payment under the Income Tax Act. ...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : No restrictions on joint bank accounts or nominations for the queer community, as clarified by the Supreme Court and RBI in August...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court of India introduces new procedures for case adjournments effective 14th February 2024, detailing strict guidelines a...
Corporate Law : Explore the updated FAQs on the implementation of the EPFO judgment dated 04.11.2022. Understand proof requirements, pension compu...
Income Tax : Comprehensive guide on CBDT's directives for AOs concerning the Abhisar Buildwell Supreme Court verdict. Dive into its implication...
Read the analysis of the Supreme Court of India’s verdict in the case of Hasmukhlal Madhavlal Patel And Anr. vs Ambika Food Products Pvt. Ltd. And Ors. regarding disproportionate allotment of shares in a right issue by a private limited company. The court’s ruling examines the applicability of Section 81 of the Companies Act, 1956 and its implications for directors’ responsibilities.
Supreme Court held that the credit note issued by a manufacturer to the dealer, relating to the replacement of defective parts, is a valuable consideration and hence, leviable to sales tax.
SC in the Ghanshyam Vs Yogendra Rathi, concerning entitlement to eviction and mesne profits based on various documents such as power of attorney, will, agreement to sell, possession memo, and sale consideration receipts
Article explains latest judgement of Indian Apex Court that the RBI’s Master Directions on Fraud must adhere to the principles of natural justice when classifying a borrower’s account as fraud. This analysis breaks down the judgement, its impacts, and what it means for borrowers. The article also dissects the principles of natural justice and their application to the Master Directions, particularly the right to be heard and the right to reputation. A must-read for those interested in Indian banking regulation and natural justice.
A landmark judgment by Supreme Court of India emphasizing importance of prompt adjudication in show cause notices, as seen in ATA Freight Line Vs Union of India case.
Supreme Court held that Order giving substantial amendment cannot be said to be clarificatory in nature and accordingly, such amendment cannot be given retrospective effect.
Case study examines Trade Refuse Charges (TRC) collected by BMC in Mumbai from businesses within its municipal area based on a circular.
Supreme Court held that for calculating limitation period for filing an appeal to NCLAT, the date on which order was pronounced and the time taken to provide certified copy is to be excluded.
Supreme Court held that User Development Fee (UDF) is in the form of ‘tax or cess’ collected for financing the cost of future projects and is not a consideration for services provided by the assessee to the customer, visitors, passengers, vendors etc.
Supreme Court reaffirmed that Section 66 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code cannot be invoked against third parties and that civil remedies available under the law must be pursued for recovery of dues from such parties.
