Corporate Law : Supreme Court cautions against misuse of Section 498A IPC in domestic disputes, emphasizing undue suffering of husbands and famili...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court issues guidelines for timely processing of mercy petitions and execution of death sentences to prevent delays and en...
Corporate Law : Analysis of the AMU judgement 2024, addressing unresolved issues on minority status, judicial delays, and implications for minorit...
Corporate Law : SC dismissed the Union of India’s appeal, directing payment of Rs 50K as costs to the widow of a soldier who died during service...
Corporate Law : SC affirms the fundamental right to legal aid for accused, stresses prosecutors' role in ensuring fair trials, and issues directio...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court Collegium recommends three advocates—Ajay Digpaul, Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, and Shwetasree Majumder—for ...
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Excise Duty : Supreme Court admits Ecoboard Industries Ltd.'s appeal on excise duty for intermediate products, questioning Tribunal's duty impo...
Excise Duty : Case Title: M/s. Marwadi Shares and Finance Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors.; Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 27124/2023; Dat...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore Supreme Court's scrutiny of whether supplying cranes for services like loading, unloading, lifting, and shifting qualifies...
Excise Duty : Supreme Court dismissed the SLP filed by the Revenue Department, upholding Delhi High Court’s judgment on CENVAT credit refund t...
Income Tax : The same was responded to by the Chartered Accountant and on becoming aware of the legal representatives of the deceased-original ...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court upholds Labour Court's factual findings, reinstating a dismissed employee while denying back wages. Read the Ganapat...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that employee remaining absent from duty for 90 days without intimating employer and employee not responding to...
Goods and Services Tax : The Supreme Court orders the lifting of a bank account attachment in Rhc Global Exports Vs Union of India, clarifying jurisdiction...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : No restrictions on joint bank accounts or nominations for the queer community, as clarified by the Supreme Court and RBI in August...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court of India introduces new procedures for case adjournments effective 14th February 2024, detailing strict guidelines a...
Corporate Law : Explore the updated FAQs on the implementation of the EPFO judgment dated 04.11.2022. Understand proof requirements, pension compu...
Income Tax : Comprehensive guide on CBDT's directives for AOs concerning the Abhisar Buildwell Supreme Court verdict. Dive into its implication...
Held, that the Income-tax Officer was justified in exercising his powers under s. 35 and rectifying the mistake. As a result of, the legal fiction about the retrospective operation of the Amendment Act, the subsequently inserted proviso must be read as.
An assessment under section 23(3) of the Act cannot be made only on bare suspcion. An assessment so made without disclosing to the assessee the information supplied by the departmental representative and without giving any opportunity to the assessee to rebut the information so supplied and declining to take into consideration all materials which the assesses wanted to produce in support of his case constitutes a violation of the fundamental rules of justice and calls for the powers under Art. 136 of the Constitution.
