Income Tax : Learn about unexplained cash credits under Section 68, tax implications, key legal cases, and compliance requirements to avoid pen...
Income Tax : Understand the applicability of Section 68 (cash credit) and Section 69 (unexplained investments) under the Income Tax Act with re...
Income Tax : The Sections by which the assessees are suffering too much due to high pitched assessments passed by NFAC are from 68 to 69D and 1...
Income Tax : Recent Chennai ITAT decisions address unexplained income, underreporting, and penalties under Sections 69A, 68, 270A, and 271. Key...
Income Tax : Learn about penalty provisions under the IT Act, including penalties for defaults in tax payment, income reporting, and more. Key ...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore reverses addition of ₹12 lakh under Section 68, accepting sales as the source of cash deposits made during demone...
Income Tax : ITAT Raipur held that penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act justifiable since no plausible explanation provided fo...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that when the sale consideration as per conveyance deed and circle rates are different, matter must be referred to...
Income Tax : ITAT Jaipur held that addition of the amount already recorded as cash sales cannot be treated as unexplained cash deposits under s...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition, treating share application money as unexplained income, based on surmises and conjectures witho...
Income Tax : Assessing Officers should follow the sequence as noted below for applying provisions of section 68 of the Act: Step 1: Whether the...
CESTAT Chandigarh held that the registration of the premises is not a pre-condition for availment of cenvat credit and thereof consequently the refund.
Discover simplified taxation scheme under Section 44AD of Income Tax Act. Learn eligibility criteria, exemptions, and key insights into this taxpayer-friendly approach.
ITAT Delhi held that initiation of reassessment proceedings u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act merely on the basis of information from other officer without cogent and demonstrable material unjustified.
ITAT Delhi held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained cash deposits unjustified as source of cash deposit successfully demonstrated by the assessee.
In the case of Ekta Garg Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi), the ITAT ruled that addition under Section 68 & 69 of the Income Tax Act cannot be made if the assessee proves the identity and creditworthiness of lenders for property purchase loans.
Analysis of the ITAT Delhi case Gloria Eugenia Rynjah Banerji Vs ITO, focusing on why income tax addition of Rs.2002801 was not deleted despite a technical error by the Assessing Officer.
The Delhi High Court has directed the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) to provide valid reasons for reversing the CIT(A)’s decision on unexplained cash credits in the case of Om Shiva Traders Pvt Ltd Vs ITO.
Explore the ITAT Delhi’s judgment in ACIT vs Rishi Infratach Pvt Ltd case pertaining to Section 68. Learn how the court settled matters related to identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of share capital transactions.
ITAT Delhi held that the cash deposited out of sales cannot be treated as income u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act once the sales are not disputed by the revenue.
ITAT Chandigarh held that transaction not recorded at the time of survey qualify as unrecorded transactions, however, the assessee has provided the necessary explanation about the nature and source of such unrecorded transactions and hence invoking deeming provisions of section 69-69D of the Income Tax Act unjustified.
