This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Addition of recorded cash sales by treating it as unexplained cash deposits not justified
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Jitendra Kumar Tahilramani Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Jaipur
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Jitendra Kumar Tahilramani Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
ITAT Jaipur held that addition of the amount already recorded as cash sales cannot be treated as unexplained cash deposits under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, addition is deleted and appeal is allowed.
Facts- The assessee is engaged in the business of trading of manufacturing and trading of gold and diamond jewellery in the name and style of M/s Jai Jagdish Jewellers. The case of the assessee was selected for complete scrutiny manually to examine the issue of abnormal increase in cash deposits during demonetization period from 09...
Author Info
