Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jitendra Kumar Tahilramani Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jitendra Kumar Tahilramani Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) ITAT Jaipur held that addition of the amount already recorded as cash sales cannot be treated as unexplained cash deposits under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, addition is deleted and appeal is allowed. Facts- The assessee is engaged in the business of trading of manufacturing and trading of gold and diamond jewellery in the name and style of M/s Jai Jagdish Jewellers. The case of the assessee was selected for complete scrutiny manually to examine the issue of abnormal increase in cash deposits during demonetization period from 09...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930