Case Law Details
Case Name : Jitendra Kumar Tahilramani Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Jaipur
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Jitendra Kumar Tahilramani Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
ITAT Jaipur held that addition of the amount already recorded as cash sales cannot be treated as unexplained cash deposits under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, addition is deleted and appeal is allowed.
Facts- The assessee is engaged in the business of trading of manufacturing and trading of gold and diamond jewellery in the name and style of M/s Jai Jagdish Jewellers. The case of the assessee was selected for complete scrutiny manually to examine the issue of abnormal increase in cash deposits
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.