Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jitendra Kumar Tahilramani Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 928/JP/2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/01/2025
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Jitendra Kumar Tahilramani Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)

ITAT Jaipur held that addition of the amount already recorded as cash sales cannot be treated as unexplained cash deposits under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, addition is deleted and appeal is allowed.

Facts- The assessee is engaged in the business

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31