Income Tax : Learn about unexplained cash credits under Section 68, tax implications, key legal cases, and compliance requirements to avoid pen...
Income Tax : Understand the applicability of Section 68 (cash credit) and Section 69 (unexplained investments) under the Income Tax Act with re...
Income Tax : The Sections by which the assessees are suffering too much due to high pitched assessments passed by NFAC are from 68 to 69D and 1...
Income Tax : Recent Chennai ITAT decisions address unexplained income, underreporting, and penalties under Sections 69A, 68, 270A, and 271. Key...
Income Tax : Learn about penalty provisions under the IT Act, including penalties for defaults in tax payment, income reporting, and more. Key ...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore reverses addition of ₹12 lakh under Section 68, accepting sales as the source of cash deposits made during demone...
Income Tax : ITAT Raipur held that penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act justifiable since no plausible explanation provided fo...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that when the sale consideration as per conveyance deed and circle rates are different, matter must be referred to...
Income Tax : ITAT Jaipur held that addition of the amount already recorded as cash sales cannot be treated as unexplained cash deposits under s...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition, treating share application money as unexplained income, based on surmises and conjectures witho...
Income Tax : Assessing Officers should follow the sequence as noted below for applying provisions of section 68 of the Act: Step 1: Whether the...
Read the full text of the ITAT Chennai order in ACIT vs. Prakash Ferrous Industries Pvt. Ltd. where the assessment order is rejected due to oversight and typographical error under section 143(3).
ITAT Hyderabad orders fresh examination of Bollam Sampath Kumar Jewellers’ cash deposits and sales during demonetization, highlighting the importance of documentation.
ITAT Upholds Reassessment on Accommodation Entry Info from Investigation Wings & affirms Addition u/s 68 Due to Lack of Credibility Evidence in Share Subscription
ITAT Ahmedabad dismisses appeal against revision order denying 80GGC deduction for donation to a political party, emphasizing the need for genuine receipts.
In the landmark Mudhol Pattina Sahakari Sangh Niyamita vs. ACIT case, ITAT Bangalore held additions under Section 68 need examination of cash deposit source.
Read the detailed analysis of the Jharkhand High Court’s decision upholding income tax additions due to failure in proving the genuineness of creditors providing cash loans.
Uttarakhand High Court held that invocation of proceedings u/s. 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for minor infraction i.e. for not carrying any delivery challan unjustified as there is no intention to evade tax.
Delhi ITAT rules in DCIT Vs Nishit Capinvest Pvt Ltd that meager control over penny stock companies doesn’t question the source of income’s legitimacy.
Kerala High Court remands matter for readjudication, ruling Income Tax addition invalid without notice on unsecured loans from five individuals.
ITAT Mumbai rules Sec 68 invoked only if taxpayer can’t explain credits in books, highlighting the importance of genuine transactions for AY 2011-12, 2012-13.
