Income Tax : Learn about unexplained cash credits under Section 68, tax implications, key legal cases, and compliance requirements to avoid pen...
Income Tax : Understand the applicability of Section 68 (cash credit) and Section 69 (unexplained investments) under the Income Tax Act with re...
Income Tax : The Sections by which the assessees are suffering too much due to high pitched assessments passed by NFAC are from 68 to 69D and 1...
Income Tax : Recent Chennai ITAT decisions address unexplained income, underreporting, and penalties under Sections 69A, 68, 270A, and 271. Key...
Income Tax : Learn about penalty provisions under the IT Act, including penalties for defaults in tax payment, income reporting, and more. Key ...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore reverses addition of ₹12 lakh under Section 68, accepting sales as the source of cash deposits made during demone...
Income Tax : ITAT Raipur held that penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act justifiable since no plausible explanation provided fo...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that when the sale consideration as per conveyance deed and circle rates are different, matter must be referred to...
Income Tax : ITAT Jaipur held that addition of the amount already recorded as cash sales cannot be treated as unexplained cash deposits under s...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition, treating share application money as unexplained income, based on surmises and conjectures witho...
Income Tax : Assessing Officers should follow the sequence as noted below for applying provisions of section 68 of the Act: Step 1: Whether the...
In the case of ITO Vs Raj Maitry & Eskon Developer, ITAT Mumbai decides advance received from customers isn’t income under section 68. Detailed analysis of the ruling.
Supreme Court held that provisions of section 71 of the Customs Act doesn’t apply when goods were not warehoused inside the notified public bonded warehouse but were unloaded outside the notified area but within factory premises and kept under a shed on permission granted by Superintended.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act unsustainable as assessee has established the genuineness of purchase and sale of shares by producing documentary evidence and transaction of purchase and sale of shares is done via banking channel.
Read the full text of the order of ITAT Bangalore regarding the dispute between BMM Ispat Limited and ACIT over unsecured loan sources. Detailed analysis and conclusion provided.
Chandan Realtors Pvt. Ltd vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) case analyzed. Liability of directors post company dissolution upheld. Read the detailed analysis and conclusion here.
Explore case of Polyspin Filteration India Pvt. Ltd. vs ITO, Delhi, shedding light on legal principle that VAT authorities’ classification of a supplier as bogus doesn’t automatically invalidate transactions, requiring factual scrutiny.
Read about the ITAT Kolkata’s decision to uphold the addition of share capital and premium under Section 68 for Invorex Trading Pvt. Ltd. vs ITO. Get insights into the case and its implications.
ITAT Chennai directs AO to investigate fabricated financial statements regarding share application money, overturning CIT(A) decision. Read the full order.
Delhi High Court held that assessment order passed without making required inquiries or verification is considered as erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue, accordingly, PCIT rightly invoked revisional powers under section 263 of the Income Tax Act.
Read the detailed analysis of Hiral Exports vs ITO case where ITAT Mumbai deletes Rs.40,82,500 addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act due to failure to rebut evidence.
