Income Tax : Explore the discussion between CA Micky and CA Mini on Sections 68 & 44AD of the Income Tax Act. Learn about unexplained cash cred...
Income Tax : Explore recent Supreme Court rulings (2023) on income tax issues. Highlights of key cases, analysis, and implications....
Income Tax : Explore sections 68 to 69D of Income Tax Act 1961, covering unexplained cash credits, investments, and more. Learn about legal pro...
Income Tax : Explore Section 68 of the Income Tax Act with our comprehensive guide on cash credits. Learn about its purpose, scope, and legal f...
Income Tax : Discover simplified taxation scheme under Section 44AD of Income Tax Act. Learn eligibility criteria, exemptions, and key insights...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that genuineness of transaction, creditworthiness and identity of creditors not proved, hence addition u/s. 68...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata held that CIT has not applied his mind analytically while assuming jurisdiction for taking cognizance under section 2...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune restored the assessment order as assessee neither filed any evidence nor provided material in an attempt to discharge th...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune directed addition u/s. 68 of the Income Tax Act towards unsecured loans as appellate deliberately withhold information f...
Income Tax : Punjab & Haryana HC upholds Principal Commissioner’s revision under Section 263. Assessing Officer’s wrong Section 44ADA asses...
Income Tax : Assessing Officers should follow the sequence as noted below for applying provisions of section 68 of the Act: Step 1: Whether the...
Read the detailed analysis of CPF (India) Private Limited Vs ACIT case where Madras High Court annulled assessment proceedings due to violation of Sec 144B procedure.
Ahmedabad ITAT dismisses appeal, denying LTCG exemption under Section 10(38) for bogus scrips. Read the full text of the order.
Kolkata ITAT deletes additions made without examining nature of expenditure, criticizing AO’s careless attitude. Full text of the order available.
ITAT Kolkata held that it is unjustified to assess share capital and share premium as unexplained cash credit u/s. 68 merely for high share premium as identities and creditworthiness of the share applicant and genuineness of the transactions duly established.
ITAT Kolkata held that addition u/s. 68 as unexplained cash credit unjustified as assessee has filed all the evidences concerning transactions to establish the identity and creditworthiness of the lenders and to prove the genuineness of the transactions.
Reassessment notice issued under section 148 on the ground that how a newly incorporated company could command a significant share premium, was purely hypothetical and lacked tangible evidence and that could not be a tangible material for arriving at reason to believe escapement of income.
ITAT Mumbai deletes LTCG addition in penny stock case, ruling in favor of Assessee. Landmark decision emphasizes genuine transactions and compliance.
Midway Exim Pvt. Ltd. appeals against ITAT Delhi’s order upholding the addition of Rs 8.18 crores u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act. The appeal challenges the reassessment proceedings, notice issuance, and provides detailed analysis on share application money.
Explore the ITAT Delhi ruling on Section 68, as it clarifies the applicability to unexplained cash credits and purchase costs in Ishwar R Pujara Vs ACIT case.
ITAT Chennai rules in favor of Mahasakthi Mills Pvt. Ltd., stating no cash credit addition when the assessee proves the genuineness of business transactions. Full order analysis.
