Income Tax : Explore the discussion between CA Micky and CA Mini on Sections 68 & 44AD of the Income Tax Act. Learn about unexplained cash cred...
Income Tax : Explore recent Supreme Court rulings (2023) on income tax issues. Highlights of key cases, analysis, and implications....
Income Tax : Explore sections 68 to 69D of Income Tax Act 1961, covering unexplained cash credits, investments, and more. Learn about legal pro...
Income Tax : Explore Section 68 of the Income Tax Act with our comprehensive guide on cash credits. Learn about its purpose, scope, and legal f...
Income Tax : Discover simplified taxation scheme under Section 44AD of Income Tax Act. Learn eligibility criteria, exemptions, and key insights...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that genuineness of transaction, creditworthiness and identity of creditors not proved, hence addition u/s. 68...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata held that CIT has not applied his mind analytically while assuming jurisdiction for taking cognizance under section 2...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune restored the assessment order as assessee neither filed any evidence nor provided material in an attempt to discharge th...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune directed addition u/s. 68 of the Income Tax Act towards unsecured loans as appellate deliberately withhold information f...
Income Tax : Punjab & Haryana HC upholds Principal Commissioner’s revision under Section 263. Assessing Officer’s wrong Section 44ADA asses...
Income Tax : Assessing Officers should follow the sequence as noted below for applying provisions of section 68 of the Act: Step 1: Whether the...
Read the full text of the ITAT Chennai order in ACIT vs. Prakash Ferrous Industries Pvt. Ltd. where the assessment order is rejected due to oversight and typographical error under section 143(3).
ITAT Hyderabad orders fresh examination of Bollam Sampath Kumar Jewellers’ cash deposits and sales during demonetization, highlighting the importance of documentation.
ITAT Upholds Reassessment on Accommodation Entry Info from Investigation Wings & affirms Addition u/s 68 Due to Lack of Credibility Evidence in Share Subscription
ITAT Ahmedabad dismisses appeal against revision order denying 80GGC deduction for donation to a political party, emphasizing the need for genuine receipts.
In the landmark Mudhol Pattina Sahakari Sangh Niyamita vs. ACIT case, ITAT Bangalore held additions under Section 68 need examination of cash deposit source.
Read the detailed analysis of the Jharkhand High Court’s decision upholding income tax additions due to failure in proving the genuineness of creditors providing cash loans.
Uttarakhand High Court held that invocation of proceedings u/s. 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for minor infraction i.e. for not carrying any delivery challan unjustified as there is no intention to evade tax.
Delhi ITAT rules in DCIT Vs Nishit Capinvest Pvt Ltd that meager control over penny stock companies doesn’t question the source of income’s legitimacy.
Kerala High Court remands matter for readjudication, ruling Income Tax addition invalid without notice on unsecured loans from five individuals.
ITAT Mumbai rules Sec 68 invoked only if taxpayer can’t explain credits in books, highlighting the importance of genuine transactions for AY 2011-12, 2012-13.
