Service Tax : Despite doing away with the service-specific descriptions, there will be some descriptions where some differential treatment will ...
Income Tax : The Parliament has passed the the Competition (Amendment) Bill, 2009 which is to replace the Competition (Amendment) Ordinance, 20...
Income Tax : The government is likely to seek the Cabinet’s approval on amending the Competition Act 2002 to facilitate the winding up of the...
Income Tax : After a lull, the contentious provisions regarding mergers and acquisitions (M&A’s) of the amended Competition Act is back on th...
Excise Duty : The appellant herein has merely utilized the credit and, to the extent that rule 3(4) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 has not been sh...
Service Tax : CESTAT Mumbai held that the allocation of head office executive and general administrative expenses by the head office of Standard...
Corporate Law : NCLAT rules that appeals under Section 61 of IBC are invalid after corporate debtor dissolution. Explore the judgment on corporate...
Corporate Law : NCLAT Chennai held that after finalization of process of e-auction sale of Corporate Debtor, it cannot be permitted to consider Sc...
Company Law : NCLT Kolkata held that unsuccessful resolution applicant has no locus to assail resolution plan once the resolution plan has been ...
Service Tax : Notification No. 43/2009-Service Tax Whereas the Central Government is satisfied that a practice was generally prevalent regarding...
Service Tax : Notification No. 33/2009 - Service Tax Central Government hereby exempts the taxable service provided to any person in relation to...
Income Tax : That the said Association will submit to the prescribed authority by 30th June, each year, a copy of their audited annual accounts...
Explore the detailed analysis of Mayur Rajendra Kumar Popat Vs Rajul Mehta & Ors. case from NCLT Mumbai. Learn about the resolution plan, creditors’ approvals, and financial implications.
CESTAT Chandigarh partly allowed Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.’s appeal against Service Tax demand, highlighting that tax under reverse charge applies when distributors incur reimbursable expenses for the taxable person. Dive into the case and understand the intricacies of the reverse charge mechanism.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that waste and scrap, even if exceeding SION norms, are exempt from customs duty provided they are cleared with proper permissions and duty payments.
Court refused to entertain the PIL but granted the aggrieved parties liberty to raise the issue of interpreting Section 66 of the PMLA Act before the appropriate forum in proper proceedings. The Court emphasized that if such an issue is raised, it will be decided in accordance with the law, leaving the rights and contentions of all parties open.
Explore the CESTAT Delhi ruling on Weldon Tours & Travels Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Service Tax, revealing no service tax liability on outbound tours. Full analysis provided.
Resolution Plan met the requirements of Section 30(2) of the Code and the Regulations 37, 38, 38(1A) and 39(4) of the CIRP Regulations. The Resolution Plan was not in contravention of any of the provisions of Section 29A of the Code and was in accordance with law.
Gloster Cables claims ownership of the GLOSTER trademark in a dispute with Fort Gloster during insolvency proceedings. Learn about the arguments on jurisdiction, assignment validity, and the impact of the BIFR order.
CESTAT Chandigarh ruled that advisory support service relating to software falls under the purview of service by software engineers, exempt from service tax. Details here.
NCLT Kolkata held that successful bidder of the Corporate Debtor is allowed to file application before Adjudicating Authority claiming reliefs and concessions, however, such reliefs and concessions cannot be too elaborate and general and must be in consonance with process document in the liquidation proceedings.
NCLT Mumbai clarifies in Black Rock Financial Services vs Piramal Capital case: Settlement or dropping Sec. 66 doesn’t end proceedings under Sec. 43 automatically.
